We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The civil rights reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Left Socialist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2390
Description[?]:
| The civil rights and their regulations are the main symbol of maturity, modernity, cultural progress and social development of a country. We must assume the responsibility to prescribed with a great legislative action a reform of the civil rights, that it opens to new and better the quality of the life of our citizens. We cannot forget the importance of the social security of the comunity , that it will have to be founded just on the respect of the freedoms characterizes them of the persons and their social duties. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning adoption.
Old value:: Adoption is illegal.
Current: Adoption is not regulated.
Proposed: Adoption is strictly regulated by the government. Only by passing several tests and by following an intensive program applicants can adopt children.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The citizens' right to assemble in public.
Old value:: The police may disperse a group without giving any reason.
Current: The police may disperse a group without giving any reason.
Proposed: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The legality of divorces (if marriages are recognised).
Old value:: Only divorces that comply with religious doctrine are legal.
Current: Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it.
Proposed: Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the initiation of divorces (if allowed).
Old value:: Only male partners may initiate a divorce.
Current: Either partner may initiate a divorce.
Proposed: Either partner may initiate a divorce.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The confidentiality of letters and correspondence.
Old value:: The confidentiality of letters is not inviolable.
Current: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate the confidentiality of letters with grounded cause.
Proposed: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate it in extreme situations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:29:53, April 13, 2007 CET | From | Darnussian Liberal Democrat Party | To | Debating the The civil rights reform |
| Message | We do not think that the local governments should make the laws for these areas. |
| Date | 11:45:32, April 13, 2007 CET | From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the The civil rights reform |
| Message | No, thats silly... And i disagree with article 2. It should be of a more moderate stance. |
| Date | 11:49:13, April 13, 2007 CET | From | Left Socialist Party | To | Debating the The civil rights reform |
| Message | Moderated? The civil freedoms are a qustion that goes moderated? Which types of restrictions want to impose communists ? |
| Date | 12:49:30, April 13, 2007 CET | From | Darnussian Liberal Democrat Party | To | Debating the The civil rights reform |
| Message | The police can disperse a group if it poses a threat? We'd support that. |
| Date | 12:50:43, April 13, 2007 CET | From | Darnussian Liberal Democrat Party | To | Debating the The civil rights reform |
| Message | If you change Articles 1, 2 and 3, I'm sure they will pass. |
| Date | 15:23:14, April 13, 2007 CET | From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the The civil rights reform |
| Message | 'The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.' |
| Date | 15:23:53, April 13, 2007 CET | From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the The civil rights reform |
| Message | We would not want fascists just roaming around in the streets while there is a potential of them attacking innocent civilians, do we? |
| Date | 05:48:42, April 16, 2007 CET | From | Darnussian Liberal Democrat Party | To | Debating the The civil rights reform |
| Message | um...is this going to a vote? |
| Date | 11:11:54, April 16, 2007 CET | From | Left Socialist Party | To | Debating the The civil rights reform |
| Message | Before the vote we show the new version of reform: Art 1,2,3. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 281 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: It is the collective responsibility of the players in a nation to ensure all currently binding RP laws are clearly outlined in an OOC reference bill in the "Bills under debate" section of the nation page. Confusion should not be created by displaying only some of the current RP laws or displaying RP laws which are no longer current. |
| Random quote: "I realize that a life predicated on being obedient and taking orders is a very comfortable life indeed. Living in such a way reduces to a minimum one's need to think." - Adolf Eichmann |