We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Aesthetic and pacifist bill 2388 concerning future energy
Details
Submitted by[?]: "Le Chaim" - Aesthetic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2390
Description[?]:
... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on nuclear power.
Old value:: The government does not take any position on nuclear power.
Current: The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc).
Proposed: Nuclear power plants are not permitted.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Renewable energy sources (eg. solar power, wind power).
Old value:: The government does not take any position with regards to renewable energy.
Current: Government subsidies are provided for research and generation of energy through renewable sources.
Proposed: Government subsidies are provided for research and generation of energy through renewable sources.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:40:47, April 14, 2007 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Aesthetic and pacifist bill 2388 concerning future energy |
Message | No. |
Date | 10:59:09, April 14, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Union Party | To | Debating the Aesthetic and pacifist bill 2388 concerning future energy |
Message | Nope. |
Date | 11:52:29, April 14, 2007 CET | From | United Forces of Decay | To | Debating the Aesthetic and pacifist bill 2388 concerning future energy |
Message | No support. |
Date | 18:39:49, April 14, 2007 CET | From | God's and the King's Fighters | To | Debating the Aesthetic and pacifist bill 2388 concerning future energy |
Message | Never. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 86 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 128 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 36 |
Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law. |
Random quote: "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator." - George W. Bush |