We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The Private Property Protection Act of 2390
Details
Submitted by[?]: Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2391
Description[?]:
A bill to take the funding and costly upkeep of the national forest system out of the hands of bureocratic government. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy regarding a national park system.
Old value:: The government devolves park policy to local governments.
Current: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Proposed: The government does not have a national park system policy.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 02:35:12, April 17, 2007 CET | From | Industrialist Party of Aloria | To | Debating the The Private Property Protection Act of 2390 |
Message | This goes against protecting our beautiful forests and other great lands for future generations! I will stand idly by and let our natural treasure dissipate into urban development. |
Date | 01:06:26, April 18, 2007 CET | From | Imperial Restoration Party | To | Debating the The Private Property Protection Act of 2390 |
Message | Agreed: At least some parts of nature should be preserved. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 270 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 249 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented |
Random quote: "You have to remember one thing about the will of the people: it wasn't that long ago that we were swept away by the Macarena." - Jon Stewart |