Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5470
Next month in: 01:50:23
Server time: 10:09:36, April 16, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Mbites2 | starfruit | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Budget proposal of September 2390

Details

Submitted by[?]: Free People's Movement

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2392

Description[?]:

The Free People's Movement propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the United Tribes of Tukarali.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:38:52, April 17, 2007 CET
FromFree People's Movement
ToDebating the Budget proposal of September 2390
MessageThis will give us a much smaller surplus.

Date23:22:00, April 17, 2007 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of September 2390
MessageA defense cut of $50 Million? Hell no. On top of that, you are cutting $190 million from Internal Affairs? Dude, this is nuts. What's even crazier is the fact that you are cutting $14 Million from Education and Culture. Stupid Stupid Stupid.

Date02:40:56, April 18, 2007 CET
FromFree People's Movement
ToDebating the Budget proposal of September 2390
MessageIt was too high in the first place. You know defense used to be at 150,000,000,000?

Education has a huge amount of funding still, one of the largest of any sector.

Date13:58:23, April 18, 2007 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of September 2390
MessageBut still...cutting it means less funding for what they need to do.

Date14:49:32, April 18, 2007 CET
FromFree People's Movement
ToDebating the Budget proposal of September 2390
MessageIf I increased one to 3 billion and then cut it to 500 million it would still be thriving. 3 billion is just overkill. Defense was overkill. 14 million is pennies on a national scale.

Date17:10:36, April 18, 2007 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of September 2390
MessageDoes not matter what it is. The fact remains that you are cutting vitally important areas. That my friend, is stupid.

Date17:15:20, April 18, 2007 CET
FromFree People's Movement
ToDebating the Budget proposal of September 2390
MessageAll areas are important. Your arguments are unreasonable.

I will move this to voting tommorow if there are no one else raises objections.

Date14:27:22, April 19, 2007 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of September 2390
MessageSome are more important than others. Education is very important but yet you are cutting it. Internal affairs is another important one but yet you are cutting that. You are also cutting defense which is a third very important position.

You say my arguments are unreasonable. Your arguments are just plane stupid as you have yet to offer a valid counter argument.

And no. I advise against that as the question has not been called.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 185

no
 

Total Seats: 0

abstain
  

Total Seats: 314


Random fact: Information about the population of each country can be found on the Population Information thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8663

Random quote: "It would be nice if the poor were to get even half of the money that is spent in studying them." - Bill Vaughan

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 52