Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 03:22:18
Server time: 12:37:41, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Luzzina | Twilighty00 | Vegaverde | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Reaffirming our Right to Defense.

Details

Submitted by[?]: Adam Smith Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2087

Description[?]:

Results of recent reviews of the policies of our neighbouring nations regarding armaments raises some serious concerns with regard to our defence capabilities. While it is appreciated that our citizens are peace loving and honourable individuals we can not make that assumption of the citizens of other nations. As such we propose that we lift the restrictions on our military technology.

The facts are (RR = Reserved right to develop, Nev = Never shall develop)
Kalistan - Pac-Agg: Central BioChem: RR Nuclear: RR
Baltusia - Pac-Agg: Mildly Pac BioChem: Nev Nuclear: RR
Valruzia - Pac-Agg: Central BioCHem: Nev Nuclear: RR
Likatonia - Pac-Agg: Mod Pac BioChem: Nev Nuclear RR

As such we feel that we should likewise reserve the right to develop Nuclear weaponry. This does not mean that we will, it simply means that we are not legally prevented from doing so. It is suggested that we reserve this right, but nuclear weapons will only be developped if such a course of action is aproved by two out of three of the Head of Government, The Foreign Minister and the Secretary of Defence. The intention is to show that we will not be intimidated, but that we are not warmongering.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:21:08, July 27, 2005 CET
FromAdam Smith Party
ToDebating the Reaffirming our Right to Defense.
MessageGuess what? Here we go again. ((There is still no emergency measures system etc. So we do have to have this on our statute books.))

Date01:11:09, July 28, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Reaffirming our Right to Defense.
Messageit's already been debated, why not move straight to the vote?

Date01:30:02, July 28, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Reaffirming our Right to Defense.
MessageBecause ASP is calling for a minimum debate time in another bill. We cant be hypocrites now, can we?

Date01:45:43, July 28, 2005 CET
FromAdam Smith Party
ToDebating the Reaffirming our Right to Defense.
MessageSee the Parliamentary procedure Act I.

Yes this has already been debated, however the parliament make up has changed since then, so there may be deal making to be done.

Date00:58:39, July 29, 2005 CET
FromAdam Smith Party
ToDebating the Reaffirming our Right to Defense.
MessagePlaced to vote now.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 227

no
   

Total Seats: 107

abstain
  

Total Seats: 116


Random fact: Voters have an extra appreciation for bills that actually get passed, so if you want to maximally take profit from your votes, make sure you compromise with others.

Random quote: "Public schools are government-established, politician- and bureaucrat-controlled, fully politicized, taxpayer-supported, authoritarian socialist institutions. In fact, the public-school system is one of the purest examples of socialism existing in America." - Thomas L. Johnson

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56