Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 02:09:17
Server time: 17:50:42, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hyraemous | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Budget proposal of August 2392

Details

Submitted by[?]: Jakania Democratic Islamist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2393

Description[?]:

The Jakania Democratic Islamist Party propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the United Jakania.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:35:02, April 21, 2007 CET
FromJakania Democratic Islamist Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of August 2392
MessageWith this small decrease in defence and other departments as well as a small increase in Head of Government spending the Jakania Democratic Islamist Party believes that a surplus is ensured in Jakania.

Date18:07:48, April 21, 2007 CET
FromScientific Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of August 2392
MessageThere are two areas where the SLP objects to reductions in spending, and those are science&technology and defense. Combine that with such a large increase in government spending (which just smacks of extra beaurocracy), and we must vote a no.

Date18:13:11, April 21, 2007 CET
FromUnited Reformation Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of August 2392
MessageWe should be increasing our budget, not decreasing. We support cuts from the military but do not see any need to increase the Head of Government Division at this time. Cuts in the Trade & Industry and Food & Agriculture Divisions are not appropriate either and will not benefit the people nor the government.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 18

no
     

Total Seats: 82

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Make sure your nation casts its nominations in Particracy's very own Security Council elections! For more information, see http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453

    Random quote: "A politician who is poor is a poor politician." - Carlos Hank Gonzalez

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 52