We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Protection Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: People's Socialist Front of Aloria
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2395
Description[?]:
To strenghten Aloria's military |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Current: The state owns all defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Proposed: The military acts as a de-facto police force, with powers of arrest.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change National service.
Old value:: There shall be no mandatory military or civilian national service.
Current: All adults upon completion of schooling can be required in times of war to serve a term in the military.
Proposed: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve a term in the military.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons if victory is not feasibile by other means.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in retaliation to any attack.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the export of weapons to other nations.
Old value:: The government allows conventional arms to be exported freely.
Current: The government must approve all arms sales on a case by case basis.
Proposed: The government must approve all arms sales on a case by case basis.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:22:21, April 26, 2007 CET | From | Industrialist Party of Aloria | To | Debating the Military Protection Act |
Message | I like the first one. About us actually having a defense industry instead of private ones. |
Date | 03:36:14, April 26, 2007 CET | From | Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition) | To | Debating the Military Protection Act |
Message | The MLP DOES NOT support this bill. |
Date | 05:38:48, April 26, 2007 CET | From | Imperial Restoration Party | To | Debating the Military Protection Act |
Message | This is an interesting bill, but I'm not a big fan of state owned industries. |
Date | 03:18:34, April 27, 2007 CET | From | Industrialist Party of Aloria | To | Debating the Military Protection Act |
Message | Defense. It's defense. Defense is important. If the state owns most of the defense industries (alongside privately owned ones) the state (and private sector) will both have control. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 325 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 214 |
Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy. |
Random quote: "Non-violence leads to the highest ethics, which is the goal of all evolution. Until we stop harming all other living beings, we are still savages." - Thomas A. Edison |