We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Alternative Remuneration of Ministers of Religion Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: RSDP - Democratic Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2087
Description[?]:
Since the original bill is not likely to pass.... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Remuneration of ministers of religion.
Old value:: Ministers of religion shall receive no remuneration whatsoever.
Current: The state does not intervene in the remuneration of ministers of religion.
Proposed: The salaries and pensions of ministers of religions shall be regulated by the law, but shall be borne by the religious communities themselves.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:52:52, July 28, 2005 CET | From | Grand Republican Party | To | Debating the Alternative Remuneration of Ministers of Religion Act |
Message | Now that seems better |
Date | 20:54:09, July 28, 2005 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Alternative Remuneration of Ministers of Religion Act |
Message | Perhaps this is a more acceptable option... Under this option there would still be some regulation in order to prevent gurus from becoming obscenely wealthy on the costs of those who believe in them. |
Date | 21:09:48, July 28, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Imperialist Party | To | Debating the Alternative Remuneration of Ministers of Religion Act |
Message | Against. I see no reason for government regulation of the salaries of employees of religious bodies over any other group of employees. |
Date | 21:55:58, July 28, 2005 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Alternative Remuneration of Ministers of Religion Act |
Message | Like I said, do you want gurus to become obsenely wealthy on the backs of those who have faith in them? |
Date | 22:24:32, July 28, 2005 CET | From | Grand Republican Party | To | Debating the Alternative Remuneration of Ministers of Religion Act |
Message | I have some reservations, but your last argument hits a chord with me |
Date | 22:37:25, July 28, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Imperialist Party | To | Debating the Alternative Remuneration of Ministers of Religion Act |
Message | "Like I said, do you want gurus to become obsenely wealthy on the backs of those who have faith in them?" If people want to give their own money to people then it's their choice. Besides, that isnt a salary. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 354 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 183 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 62 |
Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved. |
Random quote: "Oh, judge, your damn laws: the good people don't need them and the bad people don't follow them so what good are they?" - Ammon Hennacy |