We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Collective Security Council
Details
Submitted by[?]: Centrist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2397
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Collective Security Council. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Collective Security Council.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:21:22, April 28, 2007 CET | From | Centrist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Collective Security Council |
| Message | I received knowledge of this bill from a personal message from the treaty's creator. It requested I put it to a vote, which I agreed. Feel free to vote it down if you don`t like it. However, for roleplaying purpose, we could forget about the "union" and enjoy this Security Council. Thoughs? |
| Date | 16:33:20, April 28, 2007 CET | From | God's and the King's Fighters | To | Debating the Ratification of the Collective Security Council |
| Message | Yes, one: Though we could need help, if the crisis would get worse, we don't think that we're ready to enter a new international organisation, especially a military one. |
| Date | 17:01:28, April 28, 2007 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Ratification of the Collective Security Council |
| Message | It looks good. We have no problem with military alliances, provided that they are not aggressive, or do not wish to take away the sovereignty of our troops. However, this looks ok. Our only problem is the lack of enthusiasm from other nations - this could be a problem. |
| Date | 19:01:59, April 28, 2007 CET | From | Centrist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Collective Security Council |
| Message | It appears to be a fairly new treaty so enthousiasm will build once a few nations join in and are enthousiastic about it. |
| Date | 19:10:08, April 28, 2007 CET | From | Christian Democratic Alternative | To | Debating the Ratification of the Collective Security Council |
| Message | It can also strengthen our position against hostile nations. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 186 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 64 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: It is not allowed to call more than 5 elections in 5 game years in a nation. The default sanction for a player persisting in the early election tactic will be a seat reset. |
| Random quote: "The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves." - Henry Kissinger |