Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 01:30:36
Server time: 14:29:23, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Autokrator30 | HopesFor | Liu Che | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Right to Privacy Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Aldegar

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2397

Description[?]:

We, the AWP thinks that evry one have the right to privacy. Thats why we want to change a law.

From:
Right to Privacy.

Individuals have a right to privacy, but the justice can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data)

To:
Right to Privacy.

Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
__________________
The voting starts NOW!

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:49:54, April 29, 2007 CET
FromParty of Moderates
ToDebating the Right to Privacy Act
MessageNo. There are times when violating the right to privacy is necesary.

Date08:46:12, April 30, 2007 CET
FromAldegar Freedom Party
ToDebating the Right to Privacy Act
MessageWe do believe that a right such as that of privacy is something that, if too illusive, could limit our justice system. We need to ensure, above all else, that the law-abiding citizens of this nation are protected from harm at all costs, and if this means infringing on certain other people's rights to privacy, we believe this to be a worthy sacrafice considering that the big picture is much more important.

Date21:46:21, April 30, 2007 CET
FromParty of Moderates
ToDebating the Right to Privacy Act
MessageDidn't the MP recently vote for a proposal that enacted the current policy? This certainly looks like flip-flopping. Besides, can someone please explain to me why they insist on protecting the privacy of criminals? Aldegar is democratic enough that it will be difficult for the government to abuse such powers.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 353

no
   

Total Seats: 191

abstain
 

Total Seats: 106


Random fact: The use of proxy servers makes it impossible to detect multiing and is therefore forbidden. Players who access Particracy through a proxy will have their accounts inactivated.

Random quote: "I got nothing against no Viet Cong. No Vietnamese ever called me a nigger." - Muhammad Ali, 1967, refusing to fight in Vietnam

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 49