We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Right to Privacy Act
Details
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2397
Description[?]:
We, the AWP thinks that evry one have the right to privacy. Thats why we want to change a law. From: Right to Privacy. Individuals have a right to privacy, but the justice can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data) To: Right to Privacy. Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves. __________________ The voting starts NOW! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Right to privacy.
Old value:: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Current: Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
Proposed: Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:49:54, April 29, 2007 CET | From | Party of Moderates | To | Debating the Right to Privacy Act |
Message | No. There are times when violating the right to privacy is necesary. |
Date | 08:46:12, April 30, 2007 CET | From | Aldegar Freedom Party | To | Debating the Right to Privacy Act |
Message | We do believe that a right such as that of privacy is something that, if too illusive, could limit our justice system. We need to ensure, above all else, that the law-abiding citizens of this nation are protected from harm at all costs, and if this means infringing on certain other people's rights to privacy, we believe this to be a worthy sacrafice considering that the big picture is much more important. |
Date | 21:46:21, April 30, 2007 CET | From | Party of Moderates | To | Debating the Right to Privacy Act |
Message | Didn't the MP recently vote for a proposal that enacted the current policy? This certainly looks like flip-flopping. Besides, can someone please explain to me why they insist on protecting the privacy of criminals? Aldegar is democratic enough that it will be difficult for the government to abuse such powers. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 353 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 191 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 106 |
Random fact: The use of proxy servers makes it impossible to detect multiing and is therefore forbidden. Players who access Particracy through a proxy will have their accounts inactivated. |
Random quote: "I got nothing against no Viet Cong. No Vietnamese ever called me a nigger." - Muhammad Ali, 1967, refusing to fight in Vietnam |