Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5474
Next month in: 02:34:35
Server time: 17:25:24, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): albaniansunited | Luzzina | Ost | Twilighty00 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Prostitution Act 2397

Details

Submitted by[?]: Christian Democratic Alternative

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2398

Description[?]:

The CDA acknowledges that men have an inate need for sex, even if it's not with their own wives. The CDA does think that prostitutes should agree on their employment conditions independently.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:45:41, May 01, 2007 CET
FromConservative-Libertarian Party (UM)
ToDebating the Prostitution Act 2397
MessageNo. Part of the reason for it being recognised is that it ensures that health and safety legislation, or other laws of protection apply. This law is just as bad as it being illegal. It will simply be operated as a black market, just one that people can't do anything about.

Date17:40:53, May 01, 2007 CET
FromConservative Union Party
ToDebating the Prostitution Act 2397
MessageWe don't like prostitution as a whole. No support.

Date18:16:08, May 01, 2007 CET
From"Le Chaim" - Aesthetic Party
ToDebating the Prostitution Act 2397
MessageNo. It's fine as it is...

Date05:47:31, May 02, 2007 CET
FromSocialist Party of Hutori
ToDebating the Prostitution Act 2397
MessageWe argee with RiR on this one.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 55

no
       

Total Seats: 195

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election.

    Random quote: The Wolfsheim Virus is not a real actual disease in the conventional medical sense of the term. Rather, it is a cluster of symptoms which are just part of the general socio-economic disease that is capitalism. The main symptoms the sufferers are experiencing are a direct result of capitalist poverty, as in malnutrition, poor housing and so on, combined with psycho-somatic symptoms which are a direct consequence of the contradictions and stresses which are inherent to the capitalist system. ~ Friedrich Pfeiffer, General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 60