We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: eminent domain
Details
Submitted by[?]: Libertarian party of Darnussia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2088
Description[?]:
| this would eb a long long debate and i'm tired at the moment :P |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may seize private property for any reason.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:28:13, July 29, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the eminent domain |
| Message | Why for any reason? |
| Date | 18:49:02, July 29, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the eminent domain |
| Message | Because he's totalitarian :-P |
| Date | 18:57:44, July 29, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the eminent domain |
| Message | That is nuts! Stalinism! A breach of civil liberties! It's theft! People have the right to have propety the government cannot and should not just steal land off people for no reason what so ever! It is not right! |
| Date | 19:06:39, July 29, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Democratic Alliance | To | Debating the eminent domain |
| Message | You are always tired for a long debate, commie. :P |
| Date | 19:12:06, July 29, 2005 CET | From | Chinkopodian Economic Democrats | To | Debating the eminent domain |
| Message | If vital, then yes. But not for no reason.....this can very easily be exploited by the government, and looking at some of the larger parties such as Mr Stalin here.... |
| Date | 20:23:01, July 29, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the eminent domain |
| Message | beceause the options were or just for vital government things or for vital government things and corporations, why i see better housing also as a good reason to seize private property... |
| Date | 20:29:01, July 29, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the eminent domain |
| Message | Meh, naaaaah. |
| Date | 21:46:05, July 29, 2005 CET | From | Vuloch Ca Korzia | To | Debating the eminent domain |
| Message | Even I (the über stalinist fascist) am against this. |
| Date | 22:59:30, July 29, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Democratic Alliance | To | Debating the eminent domain |
| Message | NOTE: This is a joke so no offence to the Communist Party player. <<Even I (the über stalinist fascist) am against this.>> Nah, that title is reserved for the Communist Party. |
| Date | 01:02:37, July 30, 2005 CET | From | Social Libertarian party | To | Debating the eminent domain |
| Message | Wow, even COL disagrees with you, doesn't that suck? |
| Date | 10:14:56, July 30, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the eminent domain |
| Message | no, it means i'm special :P |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 149 | |||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 601 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy has been running since 2005. Dorvik was Particracy's first nation, the Dorvik Social Democrats the first party and the International Greens the first Party Organisation. |
| Random quote: "You will win, but you will not convince. You will win, because you possess more than enough brute force, but you will not convince, because to convince means to persuade. And in order to persuade you would need what you lack, reason and right in the struggle." - Miguel de Unamuno |