Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5474
Next month in: 03:51:40
Server time: 00:08:19, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: A strong body, mind and soul requires Sensible Parity.

Details

Submitted by[?]: Sensible Parity

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2403

Description[?]:

Start with the breathing. A practitioner of Sensible Parity knows this and begins there. Breathe in deeply and confidently. Then focus on the body. Stretch and bend. Bring things in with the mind. Contemplate the fullness of wrong action and the fullness of right action. And then choose correctly. This is Sensible Parity.

Can a country truly force patriotism at the barrel of a gun? Can a country create cogs out of its people? Or is one cog freely disposable if it is defective, torn, broken? This is the question Sensible Parity poses, and it is what Ophelia Westworthy and her six disciples contemplate as they gather in front of parliament to perform their breathing exercises and calisthenics.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:55:47, May 12, 2007 CET
FromConservative Union Party
ToDebating the A strong body, mind and soul requires Sensible Parity.
MessageWe don't like slavery, we don't like anti patriotism, no way.

Date17:14:25, May 12, 2007 CET
FromSensible Parity
ToDebating the A strong body, mind and soul requires Sensible Parity.
MessageSensible Parity is also against slavery and anti-patriotism. Meditate on this!

Date18:06:10, May 12, 2007 CET
FromConservative Union Party
ToDebating the A strong body, mind and soul requires Sensible Parity.
MessageThen why have you proposed slavery and anti patriotism then?

Date21:17:19, May 12, 2007 CET
FromUnited Forces of Decay
ToDebating the A strong body, mind and soul requires Sensible Parity.
MessageThis bill is about deregulation, and we'll support it.

Date02:04:56, May 13, 2007 CET
FromSensible Parity
ToDebating the A strong body, mind and soul requires Sensible Parity.
MessageWhy have we proposed what we have proposed? Ask yourself this: is a person patriotic because he is told to be patriotic? A person could never let a cat out of his home and call the cat loyal, but only when the doors are opened do you truly know. Meditate on this!

Date15:06:11, May 13, 2007 CET
FromConservative-Libertarian Party (UM)
ToDebating the A strong body, mind and soul requires Sensible Parity.
MessageThey haven't proposed slavery. They have proposed withdrawing from an international treaty. There is nothing at all wrong with that.

Date15:12:08, May 13, 2007 CET
FromConservative Union Party
ToDebating the A strong body, mind and soul requires Sensible Parity.
MessageAn international treaty which stops slavery.

Date17:49:32, May 13, 2007 CET
FromConservative-Libertarian Party (UM)
ToDebating the A strong body, mind and soul requires Sensible Parity.
MessageIt does indeed stop slavery. But just because we would withdraw from it does not mean that we would have to adopt slavery.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 12

no
     

Total Seats: 161

abstain
  

Total Seats: 43


Random fact: By default the head of government is the ultimate authority within a national government. In general terms, heads of government are expected to consult with cabinet colleagues (including those from other parties) before making significant decisions but they remain responsible for government action.

Random quote: "I've noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born." - Ronald Reagan, quoted in New York Times, 22 September 1980

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 84