We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Save recycling
Details
Submitted by[?]: Cooperative Commonwealth Federation
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2090
Description[?]:
| This bill will restore optional recycling, if the current bill "stop compulsory conservationism" passes. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government-sponsored recycling programs.
Old value:: There is no national policy regarding recycled garbage.
Current: The government funds recycling facilities and enforces mandatory recycling for residents, commercial enterprise, and industry.
Proposed: The government funds recycling facilities for public use.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 06:43:14, July 31, 2005 CET | From | Adam Smith Party | To | Debating the Save recycling |
| Message | As we made clear we will accept either compulsory recycling or no recycling policy. Half way costs a fortune and achieves nothing. |
| Date | 23:21:31, July 31, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the Save recycling |
| Message | OK then, it will restore compulsory recycling which is our preferred value anyway. It is good to know the ASP will vote in favour. |
| Date | 17:09:45, August 01, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the Save recycling |
| Message | this bill will be moved to a vote shortly. in anticipation of its possible passage, we suggest that the government impose a one-year delay to its plans to sell recycling depots in the interests of fiscal prudence. |
| Date | 04:51:46, August 02, 2005 CET | From |  Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Save recycling |
| Message | We believe that the Adam Smith Party would prefer no facilities to compulsory. |
| Date | 21:03:53, August 02, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the Save recycling |
| Message | The ASP has said it will accept either one. we shall see if that's true. |
| Date | 21:05:14, August 02, 2005 CET | From | Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Save recycling |
| Message | If that is true, that it will accept no recycling funding or compulsory, then it will either vote yes or no to this. This bill, between the two options they find acceptable, cannot prove anything. |
| Date | 21:05:46, August 02, 2005 CET | From | Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Save recycling |
| Message | In fact, they have already voted for the current option, when it was changed from compulsory. |
| Date | 21:06:33, August 02, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the Save recycling |
| Message | OOC: well, i forget to change the proposal. oh well. |
| Date | 21:09:48, August 02, 2005 CET | From | Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Save recycling |
| Message | ((I assumed you had. Oh well... Another chance to vote against it I guess....)) |
| Date | 22:05:23, August 02, 2005 CET | From | Adam Smith Party | To | Debating the Save recycling |
| Message | Well you managed to propose one of the two options we will not support. This option spends a lot of money and achieves next to nothing. |
| Date | 17:42:15, August 03, 2005 CET | From | CNT/AFL | To | Debating the Save recycling |
| Message | I voted yes on the condition that you will propose another bill that goes all the way and makes recycling compulsory. |
| Date | 02:05:10, August 04, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the Save recycling |
| Message | already proposed, and will go to a vote soon. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 233 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 171 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 46 |
| Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
| Random quote: "The only thing that saves us from bureaucracy is its inefficiency." - Eugene McCarthy |