We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Aldegar Canal Security Treaty
Details
Submitted by[?]: Centre Démocratique
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2406
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Aldegar Canal Security Treaty. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Aldegar Canal Security Treaty.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:44:03, May 16, 2007 CET | From |  Aggressive Sexist Movement | To | Debating the Ratification of the Aldegar Canal Security Treaty |
| Message | We think they're trying to put pressure on us. We strongly refuse this treaty. |
| Date | 01:04:06, May 17, 2007 CET | From | Centre Démocratique | To | Debating the Ratification of the Aldegar Canal Security Treaty |
| Message | We already have strong military ties with Aldegar through the Union des Nations Amicales. This treaty simply reinforces that treaty and further binds our two nations. |
| Date | 01:28:35, May 18, 2007 CET | From | orgonic party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Aldegar Canal Security Treaty |
| Message | we support the treaty. |
| Date | 23:42:30, May 18, 2007 CET | From | Party of Moderates | To | Debating the Ratification of the Aldegar Canal Security Treaty |
| Message | To the ASM, why do you hate this treaty? Why do you believe that Aldegar is trying to put so-called "pressure" upon your country? This treaty merely allows for your country to harness economic benefits from our military alliance. This is an act of friendship towards you. However, if you wish to deny it, then we shall respect that choice. The Republic of Aldegar loses nothing either way. |
| Date | 00:04:46, May 19, 2007 CET | From | Aggressive Sexist Movement | To | Debating the Ratification of the Aldegar Canal Security Treaty |
| Message | To say we would "hate" this treaty would be a bit much. We just don't see the point in involving our nation in this treaty because we don't see much benefit in it for us, and we strongly refuse the way the CCU got our nation involved into a merely web of treaties that bind our nation's parliament's freedom to decide about vital matters in a way different from their way of thinking. Nevertheless, because we see no considerably negative effects in this treaty, as a sign of good will towards the people of Aldegar we will accept it now. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 501 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election. |
| Random quote: "Global warmers predict that global warming is coming, and our emissions are to blame. They do that to keep us worried about our role in the whole thing. If we aren't worried and guilty, we might not pay their salaries. It's that simple." - Kary Mullis |