Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 01:28:00
Server time: 18:31:59, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): HopesFor | Interstellar. | R Drax | SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: IP Progress Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Imperialist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2406

Description[?]:

In addition to vital public works, we sometimes privatize certain goods. It may be of incrcedible value for the community that, for instance, a factory be built. Should we really let a single individual stand in the way of that? I am all for compensating those whose property must be taken, but public as well as private enterprises may have large social value.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 45

no
    

Total Seats: 276

abstain
  

Total Seats: 210


Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar).

Random quote: "History is made by angry minorities, not by passive majorities." - Fareed Zakaria

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 36