Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5474
Next month in: 03:30:53
Server time: 08:29:06, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Let Sensible Parity Prove Themselves

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Union Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2406

Description[?]:

We wish to let people vote on Sensible Parity bills in order to let them prove themselves. However during this period we wish to impose these restictions.

1. Nobody may vote yes to an SP bill concerning disarming Hutori's weapons
2. No one may be in a coalition with them

Any other bill will be fine. This bill will last for 4 years. If the Sensible Parity prove themselves the restrictions above will be lifted. If not, the old CDA bill will be reinactivated and no one may vote yes to an SP bill.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:29:17, May 18, 2007 CET
FromConservative-Libertarian Party (UM)
ToDebating the Let Sensible Parity Prove Themselves
MessageNo, this is ridiculous. You cannot tell another party how to vote. The Le Chaim Party has long opposed disarmament, and you cannot stop them from pursuing this policy. We will not stand for this.

Date15:39:25, May 18, 2007 CET
FromUnited Forces of Decay
ToDebating the Let Sensible Parity Prove Themselves
MessageThis is just discriminating, nothing more.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 26

no
      

Total Seats: 222

abstain
 

Total Seats: 2


Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar).

Random quote: "A dictatorship is a country where they have taken the politics out of politics." - Sam Himmell

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 43