We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Foreign Policy Sample Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Supreme Liberal Conservative Order
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2408
Description[?]:
What not to propose to succeed |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign embassies.
Old value:: Any other country may establish an embassy on national soil.
Current: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Proposed: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change International trade (this is a default in the absense of a specific free trade agreement or specific trade embargo)
Old value:: The nation does not impose any tariffs or quotas on imports.
Current: The nation allows for imports, but imposes "ethical" tariffs on nations with lower environmental and labour rights standards.
Proposed: The nation allows for imports, but imposes tariffs and quotas in certain areas.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The national refugee policy.
Old value:: All refugees are welcome, regardless of their reason, and given aid in integrating them into the country.
Current: Only refugees that are victims of extreme circumstances are welcome; they are given integration-aid.
Proposed: No refugees are allowed to enter the country.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:48:08, May 22, 2007 CET | From | Supreme Liberal Conservative Order | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Sample Bill |
Message | Opposing my own bill to increase visibilty. Whisss! |
Date | 00:50:54, May 22, 2007 CET | From | Supreme Liberal Conservative Order | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Sample Bill |
Message | one must not think there is something to change in the foreign policy, so if foreign policy visibilty decreases, one must put bills that increase visibilty, but change nothing. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 267 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 334 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "If voting changed anything, they'd abolish it." - Ken Livingstone |