Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5474
Next month in: 00:10:07
Server time: 19:49:52, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): echizen | HopesFor | luthorian3059 | Mity1 | Moderation | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Fishing Quota Removal

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2409

Description[?]:

Remove fishing quotas. Not only does it damage the economy, but it is also, contrary to popular belief, environmentally disadvantageous.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:13:45, May 24, 2007 CET
FromConservative Union Party
ToDebating the Fishing Quota Removal
MessageFull support.

Date17:32:45, May 24, 2007 CET
From"Le Chaim" - Aesthetic Party
ToDebating the Fishing Quota Removal
MessageEnvironmentally disadvantageous? That needs further explanation...

Date17:38:08, May 24, 2007 CET
FromConservative-Libertarian Party (UM)
ToDebating the Fishing Quota Removal
MessageIt is environmentally disadvantageous because if too many are caught, they simply have to be thrown back - dead. It is a disgrace that whilst quotas are in place, food is being thrown back into the sea, when there are people starving in the world, and poor families in Hutori who would be delighted at such a feast on their plate. Quotas just don't work. They're bad.

Date17:44:28, May 24, 2007 CET
FromConservative Union Party
ToDebating the Fishing Quota Removal
MessagePlus it means fishermen lose out on lots of money which is bad for them and the fishing industry.

Date18:00:16, May 24, 2007 CET
FromSensible Parity
ToDebating the Fishing Quota Removal
MessageNo limits mean fish can be fished unto they can be fished no more. That is not Sensible Parity.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 134

no
   

Total Seats: 86

abstain
 

Total Seats: 30


Random fact: For more information on Particracy's former colonial nations, check out http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6640

Random quote: "It would be nice if the poor were to get even half of the money that is spent in studying them." - Bill Vaughan

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61