We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Anti-Nuclear Proliferation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Centre Party of Gaduridos
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2090
Description[?]:
All nuclear weapons in the Federal Union of Gaduridos are to be decomissioned. Further, we state the resolve of this congress to take such steps as are neccesary to help our neighbours to also disarm. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Current: The nation shall never develop, produce or store nuclear weaponry.
Proposed: The nation shall never develop, produce or store nuclear weaponry.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:40:52, August 02, 2005 CET | From | Democratic Centre Party of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear Proliferation Act |
Message | Gaduridos must be a beacon of light, a force for peace in the world. With this one step we can set an example of peace and understanding. |
Date | 18:31:43, August 02, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear Proliferation Act |
Message | Although we agree with the intentions behind this bill, we feel that the lessons learned from the war with Kalistan, specifically how quickly and for absolutely no realistic reason a nation is willing to to declare war on another, this bill would not help national security at this time. |
Date | 20:29:43, August 02, 2005 CET | From | National Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear Proliferation Act |
Message | We dissagree. |
Date | 22:50:58, August 02, 2005 CET | From | Democratic Centre Party of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear Proliferation Act |
Message | NLP - are you saying you disagree with the bill, or with what the PPP's saying? PPP - I understand your concerns. I would like to have a dialogue with some of the parties in Kalistan before I send this to vote, to see if they might also consider decomissioning their nukes in concert with us. |
Date | 23:52:22, August 02, 2005 CET | From | Gaduridos National Party | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear Proliferation Act |
Message | I feel that while other nations have the capability of attacking our nation with nuclear arms, then we should be able to defend ourselves with the same weaponary that we may be attacked with. However if there was an international agreement that all nations are to put down their nuclear arms then the GNP will support this bill. While other nations keep nuclear weapons, i feel we should as well. |
Date | 01:10:09, August 03, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear Proliferation Act |
Message | We agree with the GNP. Although bilateral negotiations are well and good, there are plenty of parties and nations out theres like the BTP and the NSP in Kalistan who too easily and too willingly go to war for absolutely preposterous reasoning without a single regard whatsoever for people's lives. We must protect ourselves from such menaces. |
Date | 01:10:32, August 03, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear Proliferation Act |
Message | However, if a universal treaty was negotiated for all nations, we would support it. |
Date | 05:59:01, August 03, 2005 CET | From | National Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear Proliferation Act |
Message | As long as there are nations with WMD, we should reserve the right to have WMD. We will vote no. |
Date | 06:54:58, August 03, 2005 CET | From | Totalitarian Party | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear Proliferation Act |
Message | I disagree with this bill, for reasons already stated by other parties. |
Date | 05:16:20, August 04, 2005 CET | From | Democratic Centre Party of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear Proliferation Act |
Message | I still think saying we will wait for every other country to disarm is a copout. We still have substantial conventional forces to defend ourselves with. Someone needs to take the first step, to encourage other nations to get rid of their doomsday weapons. Why not us? I am moving this to vote, with little hope of passing it obviously, but I sincerely hope some of you will reconsider. |
Date | 07:32:12, August 04, 2005 CET | From | Totalitarian Party | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear Proliferation Act |
Message | After a bit of thought, I've changed my postion and now agree. I doubt any nations would want to use nuclear weapons on any other nation, even those that do not possess nuclear weapons., for fear of international retaliation. I think that by removing nuclear weapons from our arsenal, we set a good example for other nations to follow, while not compromising our national security. |
Date | 18:41:32, August 04, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear Proliferation Act |
Message | Given the untrustworthiness of other polititical actors, as we have seen with the BTP, certainly now is not yet a good time for this bill to pass. |
Date | 21:30:19, August 04, 2005 CET | From | National Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear Proliferation Act |
Message | Certainly, there is no good time to disarm, unless we are the only nation with nuclear weapons. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 74 | |||
no | Total Seats: 243 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 42 |
Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented |
Random quote: "The free market is ugly and stupid, like going to the mall; the unfree market is just as ugly and just as stupid, except there is nothing in the mall, and if you don't go there, they shoot you." - P. J. O'Rourke |