Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5471
Next month in: 01:50:08
Server time: 06:09:51, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Proportional Cabinet Proposal of January 2413

Details

Submitted by[?]: Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2413

Description[?]:

EVERY party gets a seat and most get at least 2.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:21:25, June 04, 2007 CET
From Fair Capitalism Party
ToDebating the Proportional Cabinet Proposal of January 2413
MessageHmm. Too big.

Date20:18:16, June 04, 2007 CET
FromIndustrialist Party of Aloria
ToDebating the Proportional Cabinet Proposal of January 2413
MessageWell since you are in it, you will vote? Besides what's wrong with diversity. It's proportional and we like it were everybody gets a piece of the pie.

Date23:19:38, June 04, 2007 CET
From Fair Capitalism Party
ToDebating the Proportional Cabinet Proposal of January 2413
MessageGovernment must be accountable to some sort of opposition; this proposal eliminates opposition to the government. It also creates a situation where every single minister (pretty much) won't be in agreement with others over, given the huge number of parties involved, quite a lot of issues. The point about coalitions is members are supposed to represent roughly the same policies, otherwise it just stagnates and is horribly inefficient or just collapses.

Before even considering this as a party, Jamies Irvine has decided to, in his capacity as SG, veto for these and other reasons, in the interests of good an efficient governance.

Date00:53:45, June 05, 2007 CET
From Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition)
ToDebating the Proportional Cabinet Proposal of January 2413
MessageFCP we gave you the seat you really wanted: FOREIGN MINISTER and still you vote NO. I thought we were moving toward compromise in this government? This is truly a dark day in Aloria.

Date22:47:32, June 05, 2007 CET
From Fair Capitalism Party
ToDebating the Proportional Cabinet Proposal of January 2413
MessageWe'd have many of those under this bloated, ineffective and deadlocked government.

Date15:50:23, June 07, 2007 CET
From Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition)
ToDebating the Proportional Cabinet Proposal of January 2413
MessageGridlock makes for modest, selective and efficient governance.

Date18:15:34, June 07, 2007 CET
From Fair Capitalism Party
ToDebating the Proportional Cabinet Proposal of January 2413
MessageOr a country in ruins?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 445

no
  

Total Seats: 121

abstain
   

Total Seats: 34


Random fact: Never use the same password as a friend. If two or more active accounts use the same password, they will be inactivated.

Random quote: "The only place where democracy comes before work is in the dictionary." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 73