We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Security in Independence Act (2nd attempt)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Söhne der Freiheit
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2090
Description[?]:
| With the rise of international espionage and viciously expansionist nations like Endralon, the Likatonian people need to step up their defence at home. Our security forces need the ability to weed out anti-Likatonian elements, the chafe from the wheat, the goats from the lambs, and the traitors from the patriots. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The citizens' right to assemble in public.
Old value:: There are no restrictions on the right of citizens to assemble in groups.
Current: There are no restrictions on the right of citizens to assemble in groups.
Proposed: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Right to privacy.
Old value:: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Current: Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
Proposed: The government has the right to monitor information of individuals without letting them know.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:20:59, August 03, 2005 CET | From | Söhne der Freiheit | To | Debating the Security in Independence Act (2nd attempt) |
| Message | Let's try this again. |
| Date | 08:25:17, August 03, 2005 CET | From | People's Party | To | Debating the Security in Independence Act (2nd attempt) |
| Message | you forgot about putting in a proposal |
| Date | 11:01:34, August 03, 2005 CET | From | Edelweiss Party | To | Debating the Security in Independence Act (2nd attempt) |
| Message | As we said before on article 1, the words 'potential risk' is a controversial term, which we cannot asure that police authorities will not always interpret this in the same way. Giving this right to authorities can lead to tribunal consequences later on. What is article 2 needed for? Likatonia is not a security state with constant extern menace. |
| Date | 11:57:58, August 03, 2005 CET | From | Right Wing Liberals Party | To | Debating the Security in Independence Act (2nd attempt) |
| Message | yes |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 127 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 100 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 45 |
| Random fact: Terra, the fictional world in which Particracy is set, consists of 8 continents: Artania, Dovani, Keris, Makon, Majatra, Seleya, Temania and Vascania. |
| Random quote: "If man asks for many laws, it is only because he is sure that his neighbor needs them; privately he is an unphilosophical anarchist, and thinks laws in his own case superfluous." - Will Durant |