We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Strong Borders Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Party of Moderates
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2416
Description[?]:
| An act to strengthen Aldegarian borders. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on illegal aliens.
Old value:: The government actively searches houses for illegal aliens and puts them in integration centers when discovered.
Current: The government actively searches houses for illegal aliens and puts them in integration centers when discovered.
Proposed: The government actively searches houses for illegal aliens and expels them from the country.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning immigration.
Old value:: Everyone is allowed to reside permanently in this nation.
Current: Quotas are based on individual applicant's qualifications.
Proposed: No foreigners are permitted to reside permanently in this nation.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:46:56, June 16, 2007 CET | From | Aldegar Freedom Party | To | Debating the Strong Borders Act |
| Message | We can support this. We certainly do need to secure our borders. |
| Date | 22:51:12, June 19, 2007 CET | From | Aldegar Liberty Party | To | Debating the Strong Borders Act |
| Message | If our allies truly believe illegal immigration is as much a problem than we'd support physically shoring up Aldegar's borders. By no means however can we support such a clearly xenophobic resolution as the first article of this bill. |
| Date | 14:36:14, June 20, 2007 CET | From | Aldegar | To | Debating the Strong Borders Act |
| Message | Article number 2 is good. But we are going to vote a no becouse Article 1. |
| Date | 21:09:34, June 20, 2007 CET | From | Party of Moderates | To | Debating the Strong Borders Act |
| Message | Xenophobic? Well, it's certainly better than being an anarchist. We aren't xenophobic. On the contrary, we welcome legal immigration. We don't, however, condone the blatant attacks on this nation's laws by providing amnesty to illegal aliens. Tell me, if you knew that you would be rewarded, instead of punished, for disobeying a law, would you do it? Of course you would. These proposals are by no means xenophobic. They are instead dutiful, as it is our duty as the government of the people to enforce the laws of this land. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 59 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 491 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Submitting a bill without any proposals in it will not attract or detract voters. It will not raise your visibility or change your political position. |
| Random quote: <script type="text/javascript"> google_ad_client = "ca-pub-2385483047681341"; google_ad_slot = "8054645962"; google_ad_width = 728; google_ad_height = 90; </script> <!-- Test --> <script type="text/javascript" src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> </script>"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." Thomas Jefferson (1743 - 1826), to Archibald Stuart, 1791 |