Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5474
Next month in: 00:49:05
Server time: 07:10:54, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Media Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Loyalistische Partei

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2416

Description[?]:

Full removal of all Censorship on Internet and International media. Some sexually explicit material should be allowed on television.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:14:31, June 17, 2007 CET
FromPopular Revolutionary Front
ToDebating the Media Bill
MessageOppose.

The Democratic Republic is under these strict conditions for safety reasons, we do not want to be invaded by the Hobrazians/Hobaists ever again, we must take drastic steps to make sure of it.

Date23:49:25, June 17, 2007 CET
FromDarnussian Liberal Democrat Party
ToDebating the Media Bill
MessageSupport.

What is the point in protecting our nation if we have to give up our freedoms?

Date02:20:00, June 18, 2007 CET
FromPopular Revolutionary Front
ToDebating the Media Bill
MessageIf we don't give up a few freedoms, then we will have to trade in every single freedom we have because we will be invaded again by foreign powers.

Date13:01:09, June 18, 2007 CET
FromDarnussian Liberal Democrat Party
ToDebating the Media Bill
MessageBut who are we to judge which freedoms should be abandoned?

Date15:34:31, June 18, 2007 CET
FromLoyalistische Partei
ToDebating the Media Bill
MessageI don't understand NCPP:s point. They voted YES for new Imigration Bill that allows more hostile foreigners to live in our country but then they say we need these restrictions to assure our liberty? There are many ways to invade a country, by force and by inhabiting it and you are clearly doing nothing to stop the later one.

Date18:46:40, June 18, 2007 CET
FromBenei Elohim
ToDebating the Media Bill
MessageThis is immoral and wrong. The Benei Elohim, the Sons of God, oppose it.

Date20:47:06, June 18, 2007 CET
FromPopular Revolutionary Front
ToDebating the Media Bill
MessageWe allow immigration because who wouldn't want to live in DARNUSSIA? People just need to obey the standards and laws of the country.

Date23:08:02, June 18, 2007 CET
FromPopular Revolutionary Front
ToDebating the Media Bill
MessageOOC: I see your point, lol. I was just being populist even though it never made sense, well I stop and be more conservative to immigration.

Date00:17:30, June 19, 2007 CET
FromThe Hobbesian Progression
ToDebating the Media Bill
MessageNo. Unless the state mediates the terms in which people think then anarchy will reign.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 105

no
   

Total Seats: 129

abstain
  

Total Seats: 47


Random fact: In cases where players have failed to clearly and accurately reference their nation's RP laws in the "Bills under debate" section, Moderation will rule them invalid if a challenge is made to their validity.

Random quote: "Liberalism is the transformation of mankind into cattle." - Friedrich Nietzsche

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 80