Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5473
Next month in: 03:20:54
Server time: 12:39:05, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): dannypk19 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Progressive Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Secular Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2416

Description[?]:

-

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:22:50, June 19, 2007 CET
FromChristian People's Party (IA)
ToDebating the Progressive Bill
Messagewe have the a problem with the whole "singles may adopt children" part of this bill

Date05:40:06, June 19, 2007 CET
FromSecular Party
ToDebating the Progressive Bill
MessageSingles can raise children just as well as couples. Besides, if you truly question the singles' ability to raise children, then we can enact a policy where there is an intense screening process if it doesn't already exist.

Date05:53:57, June 19, 2007 CET
FromChristian People's Party (IA)
ToDebating the Progressive Bill
MessageYes singles in the case of an adobtion is fra worse off than a married couple even a divorced couple and then there is the whole issue of pedophiles

Date05:56:04, June 19, 2007 CET
FromSecular Party
ToDebating the Progressive Bill
MessageI'm pretty sure intense regulation of the adoption process will allow our officials to sniff out pediophiles.

Date05:59:10, June 19, 2007 CET
FromChristian People's Party (IA)
ToDebating the Progressive Bill
MessageThere is a screening process but nothing is 100% and a single adopting children is generally somthing we worry about

Date06:08:37, June 19, 2007 CET
FromSecular Party
ToDebating the Progressive Bill
MessageYou can get pretty close to 100% with intense regulation, and that statement you mentioned applies to couple, too. The two members of that couple can both be pediophiles, or the the couple prostitute their adopted child.

Date06:17:58, June 19, 2007 CET
FromChristian People's Party (IA)
ToDebating the Progressive Bill
Messageyou just raised a lot of new good questions

Date06:22:57, June 19, 2007 CET
FromSecular Party
ToDebating the Progressive Bill
MessageOf course, adoption almost always results in enrichment of the lives of the parents and the children, especially when adoption is intensely regulated. We shouldn't restrict this merely because of a very slim minority. That applies for both singles and couples.

Date06:33:43, June 19, 2007 CET
FromChristian People's Party (IA)
ToDebating the Progressive Bill
MessageHow about The state raises all children in state institutions? then there is no problems

Date06:39:44, June 19, 2007 CET
FromSecular Party
ToDebating the Progressive Bill
MessageThen you hurt the lives of the children and the parents over a small minority of people that can simply be arrested and then jailed or killed. Besides, state officials can be corrupt or pediophiles, too.

Date06:49:25, June 19, 2007 CET
FromChristian People's Party (IA)
ToDebating the Progressive Bill
Messageit seem to us to almost be the lesser evil

Date12:20:14, June 19, 2007 CET
FromLuthori Christian Women's Association
ToDebating the Progressive Bill
MessageWe believe the best context in which to raise a child is with a married man and woman who are committed to each other and their child. However, we recognise that single people can do a good job of raising children too, and we certainly believe that, on the whole, the state does not make a great job of being a parent.


Belinda Braithwaite
(Leader of the LCWA)

Date15:18:00, June 19, 2007 CET
FromRedneck Party
ToDebating the Progressive Bill
MessageSodomites must be hung on sight. These peoposals are treasonus.

Date15:18:34, June 19, 2007 CET
FromRedneck Party
ToDebating the Progressive Bill
MessageOOC: wow is my spelling terrible at times..

Date17:08:12, June 19, 2007 CET
FromSecular Party
ToDebating the Progressive Bill
MessageThat's because you're a gay redneck.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 26

no
     

Total Seats: 74

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: "Doxxing", or the publishing of personally identifiable information about another player without permission, is forbidden.

Random quote: "Perhaps the fact that we have seen millions voting themselves into complete dependence on a tyrant has made our generation understand that to choose one's government is not necessarily to secure freedom." - Friedrich Hayek

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 76