We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Public Transportation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: New Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2418
Description[?]:
Providing assistance for low-income Lodamese will allow for better job opportunities and strengthen our nation's productivity. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Funding of public transport (where applicable).
Old value:: Public transport is fully user-pays.
Current: Local governments decide upon the funding policy.
Proposed: Public transport is fully subsidised for people with low-income, with the remainder "user-pays".
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:58:29, June 20, 2007 CET | From | Radical Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Public Transportation Act |
Message | We can agree again, but we would like to see this go further. |
Date | 04:24:49, June 20, 2007 CET | From | New Democratic Party | To | Debating the Public Transportation Act |
Message | As would we. Hopefully, this is an incremental step in the right direction. |
Date | 05:06:59, June 20, 2007 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Public Transportation Act |
Message | URP believes in full user-pays, however we believ it would be better left to local governments than subjected to this huge national program. |
Date | 05:34:40, June 20, 2007 CET | From | The Unified Lodamun Party | To | Debating the Public Transportation Act |
Message | THe ULP completely agrees with the URP oddly enough. |
Date | 04:21:12, June 21, 2007 CET | From | Independent Republican Party | To | Debating the Public Transportation Act |
Message | Yes, it should be a local matter. |
Date | 17:00:41, June 22, 2007 CET | From | Communist Party of Lodamun | To | Debating the Public Transportation Act |
Message | As it is a small step towards nationalization, the CPL votes yes. |
Date | 19:12:21, June 22, 2007 CET | From | Lodamun Distributionist Party | To | Debating the Public Transportation Act |
Message | We also agree that local governments hshould have the final word, but we can support this version for now. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 231 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 368 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The forum contains a lot of useful information, it has updates to the game, role playing between nations, news and discussion. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
Random quote: Henceforth, the current system of first and second class stamps, where the rich can pay to have their mail delivered faster than the poor, shall be BANNED. There shall be only one class of mail delivery, and ALL mail shall travel at the SAME speed for EVERYBODY. There can be no class discrimination in the People's Post Office! There must be the SAME class of mail service FOR ALL! ~ Friedrich Pfeiffer General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party |