Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5472
Next month in: 02:30:33
Server time: 05:29:26, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): albaniansunited | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Public Transportation Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: New Democratic Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2418

Description[?]:

Providing assistance for low-income Lodamese will allow for better job opportunities and strengthen our nation's productivity.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:58:29, June 20, 2007 CET
FromRadical Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Public Transportation Act
MessageWe can agree again, but we would like to see this go further.

Date04:24:49, June 20, 2007 CET
FromNew Democratic Party
ToDebating the Public Transportation Act
MessageAs would we. Hopefully, this is an incremental step in the right direction.

Date05:06:59, June 20, 2007 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Public Transportation Act
MessageURP believes in full user-pays, however we believ it would be better left to local governments than subjected to this huge national program.

Date05:34:40, June 20, 2007 CET
FromThe Unified Lodamun Party
ToDebating the Public Transportation Act
MessageTHe ULP completely agrees with the URP oddly enough.

Date04:21:12, June 21, 2007 CET
FromIndependent Republican Party
ToDebating the Public Transportation Act
MessageYes, it should be a local matter.

Date17:00:41, June 22, 2007 CET
FromCommunist Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the Public Transportation Act
MessageAs it is a small step towards nationalization, the CPL votes yes.

Date19:12:21, June 22, 2007 CET
FromLodamun Distributionist Party
ToDebating the Public Transportation Act
MessageWe also agree that local governments hshould have the final word, but we can support this version for now.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 231

no
    

Total Seats: 368

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: The forum contains a lot of useful information, it has updates to the game, role playing between nations, news and discussion. http://forum.particracy.net/

    Random quote: Henceforth, the current system of first and second class stamps, where the rich can pay to have their mail delivered faster than the poor, shall be BANNED. There shall be only one class of mail delivery, and ALL mail shall travel at the SAME speed for EVERYBODY. There can be no class discrimination in the People's Post Office! There must be the SAME class of mail service FOR ALL! ~ Friedrich Pfeiffer General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 78