We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Right of Choice Act 2416
Details
Submitted by[?]: Free Movement of Gaduridos
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2418
Description[?]:
| ..... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Health care policy.
Old value:: Health care is entirely public and free; private clinics are banned.
Current: There is a free public health care system and a small number of private clinics, which are heavily regulated to ensure they treat their patients well and provide good care.
Proposed: There is a free public health care system and a small number of private clinics, which are heavily regulated to ensure they treat their patients well and provide good care.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:02:33, June 21, 2007 CET | From | Gaduri Resistencia | To | Debating the Right of Choice Act 2416 |
| Message | We believe that having private and public service in competition only serves to undermine both. That said, we're voting in favour because we're scheming bastards. |
| Date | 06:04:33, June 21, 2007 CET | From | Capitalists for Prosperity | To | Debating the Right of Choice Act 2416 |
| Message | Oddly enough, we're voting against this. |
| Date | 09:49:46, June 21, 2007 CET | From | Gaduri Resistencia | To | Debating the Right of Choice Act 2416 |
| Message | Help.. everything's gone crazy... |
| Date | 15:47:21, June 21, 2007 CET | From | Free Movement of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Right of Choice Act 2416 |
| Message | why capitalist? |
| Date | 16:15:34, June 21, 2007 CET | From | Capitalists for Prosperity | To | Debating the Right of Choice Act 2416 |
| Message | We bought into the HCP's arguments about having doctors being taken by the more profitable, and thus, better paying private sector. So, we're voting against having both sectors coexisting. However, we are considering a proposal that goes a step beyond what you made where there is no public sector, and the state pays for those on the lower income brackets. |
| Date | 06:17:35, June 22, 2007 CET | From | Capitalists for Prosperity | To | Debating the Right of Choice Act 2416 |
| Message | We decided to vote in favor of this after all, not that it matters now. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 81 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 354 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, it is the responsibility of players to ensure the candidate boxes on their Party Overview screens are filled in with appropriate names. If a player is allotted seats in a Cabinet bill and has not filled in names for the relevant candidate position, then the program will automatically fill in the positions with names which might not necessarily be appropriate for the Cultural Protocols. |
| Random quote: "I'm not a leftist; I'm where the righteous ought to be." - M.M. Coady |