We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Tobacco Act of 16
Details
Submitted by[?]: Free Movement of Gaduridos
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2418
Description[?]:
....... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards smoking.
Old value:: Smoking is prohibited.
Current: Smoking is legal outdoors and in private homes and clubs, but illegal indoors in all places of employment.
Proposed: Smoking is legal everywhere, at the discretion of the property owner, but is illegal in government-owned buildings.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Sale of tobacco products.
Old value:: The sale of tobacco products is prohibited.
Current: There are certain restrictions on the sale of tobacco and only adults may purchase tobacco.
Proposed: Only adults may purchase tobacco.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 06:08:01, June 21, 2007 CET | From | Capitalists for Prosperity | To | Debating the Tobacco Act of 16 |
Message | We already got our population off this dangerous substance. There is no reason to get them hooked back on it. |
Date | 15:46:53, June 21, 2007 CET | From | Free Movement of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Tobacco Act of 16 |
Message | theres no reason to ban it either, it is a thing of freewill. (and don't ya think theres an underground movement buying and selling anyways) |
Date | 16:20:22, June 21, 2007 CET | From | Capitalists for Prosperity | To | Debating the Tobacco Act of 16 |
Message | The black market for substances like those are very active during the first years, but it does weaken over time. The police with their budget about to be increased tenfold will be able to hurt the remnants of the black market. |
Date | 16:22:09, June 21, 2007 CET | From | Gaduri Resistencia | To | Debating the Tobacco Act of 16 |
Message | With the capitalist scum on this one. Legalising it would just be giving in anyway. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 26 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 409 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "The basis of a democratic state is liberty." - Aristotle |