We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Call for early elections, April 2090
Details
Submitted by[?]: Market Socialist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.
Voting deadline: December 2090
Description[?]:
| We, the Market Socialist Party, call for early elections as soon as we can reach a consensus. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:29:22, August 04, 2005 CET |
From | Nous-Mêmes | To | Debating the Call for early elections, April 2090 | | Message | Despite the original decision of the Moderates to try to work with the Democratic Party, it has quickly become clear that our original worries about their extremist stances was what we should have heeded. The Moderates, therefore, announce their ending of the coalition, their vote of no confidence in the current cabinet, and will support a new election. |
| Date | 09:15:43, August 04, 2005 CET |
From | Party of the Republic | To | Debating the Call for early elections, April 2090 | | Message | The party of the Republic doesnt support this measure to end the current government. Elections are less than a year away from occuring. The Democrats havent been as horrible as people are making them out to be. Some parties are just seeking an early election for votes, so they have an actual say in the government. There is no pressing need for a new government. There is no one party which has been active for a long enough time to anger the rest of the nation. This bill should be defeated so that the government can operate efficantly until the actual elections take place. |
| Date | 14:00:50, August 04, 2005 CET |
From | Voice of the People | To | Debating the Call for early elections, April 2090 | | Message | We agree with the Party of the Republic on this issue. Calling for an early election so close to the actual elections seems pointless. This will not be fair on the people after readying themselves for the election at its proper time. We understand the reasons why this call has been proposed, but as extreme as the DPAR have been recently, we might as well wait until the proper time. If this was called a year ago, then perhaps we would have supported it. |
| Date | 15:34:50, August 04, 2005 CET |
From | Market Socialist Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, April 2090 | | Message | We did realize that this call for early elections were a bit near the actually election date. We proceeded with the creation of this bill so that we can defeate the "Civil Rights Act" before it is put into effect. Plus, the Communist Party has been inactive and is taking up 19 seats, which is flusterating. I implore the Party of the Republic to change their stance on this resolution. |
| Date | 18:09:12, August 04, 2005 CET |
From | Democratic Party of Aldurian Republic | To | Debating the Call for early elections, April 2090 | | Message | Choice election was former premature also. And it due to my voices. Never we will vote , governments will be changed in country continuously jesli. We need stabilization, but it demands nation from we strained work. Market Socialist Party - let's take for work!
|
| Date | 19:10:28, August 04, 2005 CET |
From | Party of the Republic | To | Debating the Call for early elections, April 2090 | | Message | I believe what the DPAR is saying is quite simply, the choice for early elections is premature, they'll never vote yes because you want an early election solely on how they feel. The nation needs a continous stable government and that stable government requires work. The Market Socalists should work toward stablization and not a call for early elections |
| Date | 21:55:49, August 04, 2005 CET |
From | Market Socialist Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, April 2090 | | Message | How about a compromize?
We will withdraw our request for early elections if you with draw your "Civil Rights Act." You say forming a new government takes work so, are you ready to work, DP? |
| Date | 05:02:22, August 05, 2005 CET |
From | Party of the Republic | To | Debating the Call for early elections, April 2090 | | Message | Again I call for restraint with this bill. Elections will be held on their normal schedule in less than a year. Political expression is free in this country. Just because you dont like it doesnt mean you can call for early elections. If the people want a change in government then wait for the elections in 10 months and the people will vote them out. Its not for you to decide. |
| Date | 05:17:28, August 05, 2005 CET |
From | Nous-Mêmes | To | Debating the Call for early elections, April 2090 | | Message | right now, it appears from a party persective, we sit deadlocked on this proposal. The Moderates initially supported, before dropping back to abstain, in a show of retraint. As government partners, we sit with a party we hoped that despite our frequent battles, we hoped we could work with. It has become clear that this is not the case. Therefore, the Moderates will support the early elections, and hope that we can again get a majority coalition, too often a rarity, back in power. |
| Date | 05:31:20, August 05, 2005 CET |
From | Party of the Republic | To | Debating the Call for early elections, April 2090 | | Message | This bill is reckless and is made by an anarchist party which has threatened to start a seperatist movement if a bill they disagree with is passed. The nation needs stability, not a revolving door of elections. ESPECIALLY with TEN months. Just TEN months until the election. |
| Date | 05:32:24, August 05, 2005 CET |
From | Party of the Republic | To | Debating the Call for early elections, April 2090 | | Message | This bill is reckless and is made by an anarchist party which has threatened to start a seperatist movement if a bill they disagree with is passed. The nation needs stability, not a revolving door of elections. ESPECIALLY with TEN months. Just TEN months until the election. |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
| Vote |
Seats |
| yes | Total Seats: 52 |
| no | Total Seats: 48 |
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "Nation raiding" or a malevolent coordinated effort by a single user or group of users to interrupt the gameplay, significantly alter the culture or direction of a nation is strictly prohibited. Players interacting in nation raiding will be sanctioned. |
| Random quote: "We can only protect liberty by making it relevant to the modern world." - Tony Blair |