Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 01:40:06
Server time: 18:19:53, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): ADM Drax | hexaus18 | hexaus19 | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Animal Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Republics Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2418

Description[?]:

Removes restrictions which limit the safety and happiness of Lodamese citizens.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:27:17, June 23, 2007 CET
FromThe Unified Lodamun Party
ToDebating the Animal Act
MessageWow, the URP should go to hell for this one.

Date06:42:38, June 23, 2007 CET
FromLodamun Distributionist Party
ToDebating the Animal Act
MessageThere is no reason, in the opinon of the LDP, why there should NOT be regulations on animal testing. We feel that it is the only way to keep private companies, driven by profits, morally culpable. Clearly the safety of humans is more important than the safety of animals, but there is a moral issue at stake that cannot be left to individual corporations.

We support the abolishment of animal testing in regards to cosmetics and other non-essential products altogether.

Date10:57:11, June 23, 2007 CET
FromCommunist Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the Animal Act
MessageThe CPL believes that animal testing should be legal, but strictly regulated.
The CPL will vote no.

Date13:07:56, June 23, 2007 CET
FromDemocrats
ToDebating the Animal Act
MessageIn the interest of government unity, we shall back.

Date13:23:26, June 23, 2007 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Animal Act
MessageThe URP thanks the NMP for its support, however this bill is something of a stretch. URP has long supported the use of animals in research, however we urge the NMP to vote its conscience on this issue whichever way that may be.

Date15:48:46, June 23, 2007 CET
FromRadical Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Animal Act
MessageThis is immoral and cruel, we must oppose at all costs. Do you people have no morals?

Date19:34:50, June 23, 2007 CET
FromLodamun Distributionist Party
ToDebating the Animal Act
Message"In the interest of government unity, we shall back completely unregulated testing on animals for any trivial purpose, no matter how else the testing could be done, so long as it saves money."

We can understand governmental unity, but we're not sure that this was the proposal to take a stand on. Even the URP is a little hesitant about that statement.

Date00:20:32, June 24, 2007 CET
FromDemocrats
ToDebating the Animal Act
MessageWe believe that article two is vital, if lives can be saved, then science must advance.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 322

no
      

Total Seats: 277

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left.

    Random quote: "It is the hallmark of great society to debate and disagree without resorting to violence." - Mathew Jameson, former Hutorian politician

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 79