We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Return to the Ancients
Details
Submitted by[?]: Saiken Renmei
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2420
Description[?]:
| Our party believes that Ancient Sekowian should recieve Government support as the language of Sekowian culture and civilization. Thus we want Ancient Sekowian to be the new official language of our Archonate. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:03:55, June 24, 2007 CET | From |  Imperial Pluralism Party | To | Debating the Return to the Ancients |
| Message | I fully support this. I'm fairly interested in linguistics and classical languages, so I'll design it on the wiki, if all consent. But can we call it something else? How about "Old High Sekowan?" |
| Date | 22:39:44, June 26, 2007 CET | From | Saiken Renmei | To | Debating the Return to the Ancients |
| Message | Ok, that would be a good idea. |
| Date | 22:44:46, June 26, 2007 CET | From | Saiken Renmei | To | Debating the Return to the Ancients |
| Message | Could you also write something on Aretism? I am quite interested in the predominant religion in Sekowo. |
| Date | 21:16:22, June 27, 2007 CET | From | Imperial Pluralism Party | To | Debating the Return to the Ancients |
| Message | The Aretism article is already written: http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Aretism There was also a huge civil war: http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Sekowo_Civil_War |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes |
Total Seats: 125 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "If voting changed anything, they'd abolish it." - Ken Livingstone |