Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5474
Next month in: 02:40:25
Server time: 21:19:34, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): GLNBei | Interstellar. | Mity1 | TaMan443 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Création de parcs nationaux/ Bill for creation of Nationaly managed National Parks

Details

Submitted by[?]: Alliance Démocratique Ecologiste Rildani

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2419

Description[?]:

Considering that preservation of Rildanian ecosystem is of the utmost importance for future generation.
Considering that preservation of Rildanian ecosystem is of the utmost importance for the evolution of biology and environmental sciences.

We propose the creation of national parks and marine protected spaces promoted by governement, where building and exploitation is forbidden and where eco-tourism is promoted.

This bill will provide a protection of Rildanian Wild life, promote Rildanian tourism and economy and improve Rildanian reputation in foreign countries

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:07:47, June 23, 2007 CET
FromLutte Féministe de Libération
ToDebating the Création de parcs nationaux/ Bill for creation of Nationaly managed National Parks
Message"Absolutely. This is not a matter for local governments, especially since many parks may cross Canton lines. EASL supports fully."

-Olivia Fournier
MNA, EASL
Environment and Tourism Committee

Date17:36:26, June 24, 2007 CET
FromAlliance Démocratique Ecologiste Rildani
ToDebating the Création de parcs nationaux/ Bill for creation of Nationaly managed National Parks
MessageWe would just like to know the reasons for PNR to vote against this bill. Does PNR not care about National Wide Life?

Date17:48:32, June 24, 2007 CET
From Front Canrillaise
ToDebating the Création de parcs nationaux/ Bill for creation of Nationaly managed National Parks
MessageVoting against this bill does not mean that there is no concern for national wild life, there are still local governments that will take care of it.

Date19:50:28, June 25, 2007 CET
FromAlliance Démocratique Ecologiste Rildani
ToDebating the Création de parcs nationaux/ Bill for creation of Nationaly managed National Parks
MessageAnd governement that won't... and will promote building on important biotops of Rildanor.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 43

no
   

Total Seats: 57

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Any RP law granting extraordinary "emergency powers" or dictator-like powers to a government must be passed by at least a 2/3rds majority, but (like all RP laws) may always be overturned by a simple majority vote of the legislature.

    Random quote: "A leader has the vision and conviction that a dream can be achieved. He inspires the power and energy to get it done." - Ralph Nader

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 55