We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Création de parcs nationaux/ Bill for creation of Nationaly managed National Parks
Details
Submitted by[?]: Alliance Démocratique Ecologiste Rildani
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2419
Description[?]:
Considering that preservation of Rildanian ecosystem is of the utmost importance for future generation. Considering that preservation of Rildanian ecosystem is of the utmost importance for the evolution of biology and environmental sciences. We propose the creation of national parks and marine protected spaces promoted by governement, where building and exploitation is forbidden and where eco-tourism is promoted. This bill will provide a protection of Rildanian Wild life, promote Rildanian tourism and economy and improve Rildanian reputation in foreign countries |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy regarding a national park system.
Old value:: The government devolves park policy to local governments.
Current: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Proposed: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:07:47, June 23, 2007 CET | From | Lutte Féministe de Libération | To | Debating the Création de parcs nationaux/ Bill for creation of Nationaly managed National Parks |
Message | "Absolutely. This is not a matter for local governments, especially since many parks may cross Canton lines. EASL supports fully." -Olivia Fournier MNA, EASL Environment and Tourism Committee |
Date | 17:36:26, June 24, 2007 CET | From | Alliance Démocratique Ecologiste Rildani | To | Debating the Création de parcs nationaux/ Bill for creation of Nationaly managed National Parks |
Message | We would just like to know the reasons for PNR to vote against this bill. Does PNR not care about National Wide Life? |
Date | 17:48:32, June 24, 2007 CET | From | Front Canrillaise | To | Debating the Création de parcs nationaux/ Bill for creation of Nationaly managed National Parks |
Message | Voting against this bill does not mean that there is no concern for national wild life, there are still local governments that will take care of it. |
Date | 19:50:28, June 25, 2007 CET | From | Alliance Démocratique Ecologiste Rildani | To | Debating the Création de parcs nationaux/ Bill for creation of Nationaly managed National Parks |
Message | And governement that won't... and will promote building on important biotops of Rildanor. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 43 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 57 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Any RP law granting extraordinary "emergency powers" or dictator-like powers to a government must be passed by at least a 2/3rds majority, but (like all RP laws) may always be overturned by a simple majority vote of the legislature. |
Random quote: "A leader has the vision and conviction that a dream can be achieved. He inspires the power and energy to get it done." - Ralph Nader |