Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5474
Next month in: 01:55:50
Server time: 10:04:09, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Moderation | TH081 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Prepared Citizenry Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Lodamun Distributionist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2421

Description[?]:

We recognize the ownership of personal firearms as a right of the citizens of the United Kingdoms of Lodamun, but we cannot understand why any private citizen would need to own/use a military-grade weapon. What purpose could this possibly serve? Weapons are tools for hunting and personal self-defense. You don't hunt white-tailed deer with an MP5.

What do the other parties feel about this issue? Our choice would be to allow citizens to only own certain weapons, but be able to take them generally anywhere, unless prohibited by the specific establishment .

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:28:32, June 23, 2007 CET
FromDemocrats
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageWe would support a ban of such weapons.

Date13:31:18, June 23, 2007 CET
FromCommunist Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageWe believe that citizens can carry certain weapons. They must not be concealed and can carry them generally anywhere.

Date15:47:46, June 23, 2007 CET
FromRadical Nationalist Party
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageWe are undecided on the issue, we feel that a well armed population is a well defended nation.

Date19:29:28, June 23, 2007 CET
FromLodamun Distributionist Party
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageWe agree with the NP, but without a clear enemy, we are very heavily armed only against ourselves. We don't see anything good coming out of this situation.

Date21:12:01, June 23, 2007 CET
FromRadical Nationalist Party
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageOOC: This could lead us more to a possible RP of taking MIgadon as a Lodamun region.

Date21:26:04, June 23, 2007 CET
FromFree Lodamun
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageOOC: if i had an mp5 i would probably hunt deer with it. and i don't hunt now.

All the more reason then to give our people the option of military training out of school. I've said it before and I'll say it again: Who messes with the Swiss? No one. Damn right.

OOC: i agree with the NP. private citizens taking action independently of national government to take a territory? that sounds like an awful lot of fun. we need to see where migadon stands on this. NP, want to find out, we cna maybe get this ball rolling.

Date21:27:08, June 23, 2007 CET
FromLodamun Distributionist Party
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageOOC: can the Swiss carry concealed automatic weapons?

Date21:52:23, June 23, 2007 CET
FromDemocrats
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
Messageooc: No, but they can keep them at home, and are supposed to practice every now and then (they get them from their national service).

Date22:29:28, June 23, 2007 CET
FromFree Lodamun
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageOOC: i'm so in love with that policy.

Date22:43:56, June 23, 2007 CET
FromRadical Nationalist Party
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageOOC: the whats should the NP do, should we go and ask directly Telamon?

Date23:17:51, June 23, 2007 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
Messageask telamon what? Let me make it clear that the NP does not have the authority to launch an invasion. From what I've read it requires the Prime Minister and Defense Minister to support it. Everitt Diggory will not support an expansionist invasion.

Date23:34:17, June 23, 2007 CET
FromFree Lodamun
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageOOC: hey yugi, i need you to listen as hard as you can. Its not up to you what we roleplay. If the np wants to talk to telemon and get a mlitia under his control or completely independent of the national government to invade and occupy telamon, that's his business. Its fun. not just for telamon but for us. even for you if you allow it to be.

Also, you're not supposed to respond to OOC speech in character, don't acknowledge that they're even there unless preceded with an OOC of your own. You just responded to my comment about training our population better with some turrets comment about permission to invade telamon.

Try and play the game the rest of us are playing, you'll have fun, I promise.

Date23:57:44, June 23, 2007 CET
FromRadical Nationalist Party
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageOOC: We may not have the Authority YET, its unlikely that you will remain the largest party forever. We can start preparing thing for the future and find out the attitude we are likely to get from Telamon.

Date00:44:33, June 24, 2007 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageIf the NP raises an independent army to invade another nation, the URP will ask Parliament to assist Migadon.

Date00:55:23, June 24, 2007 CET
FromDemocrats
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageIt would be easier to use the police to arrest any troublemakers.

Date01:01:58, June 24, 2007 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageFL: actually RP should follow a basic framework.

Date02:02:12, June 24, 2007 CET
FromRadical Nationalist Party
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageNP isnt interested in raising a private army, we would rather do this through diplomacy.

Date02:41:12, June 24, 2007 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageIf you aren't interested in a private army, why have you created one?

Date11:37:01, June 24, 2007 CET
FromRadical Nationalist Party
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageIt is only a protective wing, and it makes RPing more interesting.

Date18:57:19, June 27, 2007 CET
FromLodamun Distributionist Party
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessagePlease note the added proposals.

OOC: We would like to move to a Swiss-style public firearms program. Please chime in.

Date20:14:50, June 27, 2007 CET
FromDemocrats
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageSupport. Perhaps it could be mentioned, as an amendment to Article Two, that citizens cannot carry arms onto state property? (ie Schools, Parliament, the Royal Palaces)

Date00:57:54, June 28, 2007 CET
FromLodamun Distributionist Party
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageAs the owner of state property, I suspect that the state would generally make that ruling, yes.

Is it important to add to the proposal itself, or can that be reasonably assumed?

Date01:03:24, June 28, 2007 CET
FromDemocrats
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageI guess it can be assumed.

Date00:13:23, June 29, 2007 CET
FromThe Unified Lodamun Party
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageSo, does this bill get rid of all the weapons that people don't need for hunting?? If that is the case, the ULP fully supports this bill, however if this bill is now allowing anyone to own and carrry any weapon so long as it is visible to the public, well we just are afraid of such a bill. To tell the truth, if someone is carrying a a fully loaded bazooka (sp), I don't wnat to know about it. Granted, if it were a bazooko, I probably would regardless. That notwishtstanidng, the ULP supports the limiting of the types of weapons that are allowed to be owned, and used.

Date00:53:36, June 29, 2007 CET
FromIndependent Republican Party
ToDebating the The Prepared Citizenry Act
MessageWe support Article One, but can't support Article Two. We would prefer restricting what types of weapons citizens can carry. However, because we believe that if someone is carrying a weapon, others should see it, we will support this bill.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 320

no
   

Total Seats: 279

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer".

    Random quote: "Poverty is like punishment for a crime you didn't commit." - Eli Khamarov

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 106