We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The Human Rights Bill (II)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Chinkopodian Economic Democrats
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2096
Description[?]:
| http://www.takeforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1398&mforum=particracy Which bits are people not pleased about? |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:25:01, August 04, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the The Human Rights Bill (II) |
| Message | I am pleased with it all, myself |
| Date | 19:33:11, August 04, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Democratic Alliance | To | Debating the The Human Rights Bill (II) |
| Message | All of it is perfect. |
| Date | 23:07:17, August 04, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the The Human Rights Bill (II) |
| Message | it's not ideologically neutral! Economic Rights and Freedoms Right to Property well those are the parts that go against my ideology and are therefore a restriction on our democracy! If someone else disagrees with some it's also a restriction... We could not develop socialism beceause of that law... |
| Date | 12:59:07, August 05, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the The Human Rights Bill (II) |
| Message | Right to Nationality; Freedom to Marry isn't ideologically neutral either well thats it i think the rest just helps our democracy in stead of hurting it... |
| Date | 21:46:39, August 05, 2005 CET | From | Chinkopodian Economic Democrats | To | Debating the The Human Rights Bill (II) |
| Message | Could you give the article numbers for those? |
| Date | 23:59:52, August 05, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the The Human Rights Bill (II) |
| Message | it's no official treaty i think. http://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/main/treaties.php |
| Date | 10:42:28, August 06, 2005 CET | From | Chinkopodian Economic Democrats | To | Debating the The Human Rights Bill (II) |
| Message | Not yet, no. But it's been on the forums for a while, and those in the International Human Rights Movement havve asked the nations in it to try and ratify the two treaties. |
| Date | 10:42:47, August 06, 2005 CET | From | Chinkopodian Economic Democrats | To | Debating the The Human Rights Bill (II) |
| Message | Could you give the article numbers? |
| Date | 10:58:28, August 06, 2005 CET | From | Chinkopodian Economic Democrats | To | Debating the The Human Rights Bill (II) |
| Message | No, it is a treaty now. It's the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Second one down. |
| Date | 14:01:54, August 06, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the The Human Rights Bill (II) |
| Message | http://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/main/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=4 but i dont have time to look which one are ideologically neutral |
| Date | 14:30:55, August 08, 2005 CET | From | Chinkopodian Economic Democrats | To | Debating the The Human Rights Bill (II) |
| Message | Look, if you're not happy with a part of it, give me the article numbers - we can choose which ones to ratify. If you don't, then we can just ratify the whole thing. |
| Date | 19:10:11, August 08, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the The Human Rights Bill (II) |
| Message | well i agree with all but i dont know about the rest for the ideological part... |
| Date | 20:11:04, August 11, 2005 CET | From | Chinkopodian Economic Democrats | To | Debating the The Human Rights Bill (II) |
| Message | I'll start the voting for it......see what happens. |
| Date | 09:05:31, August 13, 2005 CET | From | Social Libertarian party | To | Debating the The Human Rights Bill (II) |
| Message | I agree with COL (Strangly enough) It's not idealogically neutral. Socialism could be devoloped but Communism couldn't. |
| Date | 12:53:43, August 15, 2005 CET | From | Chinkopodian Economic Democrats | To | Debating the The Human Rights Bill (II) |
| Message | We voted on this....umm....TWICE now? :D |
| Date | 18:11:57, August 15, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the The Human Rights Bill (II) |
| Message | Heh...ironic considering you guys force people into labor unions... "Article 20 (2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association. " |
| Date | 18:29:48, August 15, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the The Human Rights Bill (II) |
| Message | Article 3 This ratifiers acknowledge that with respect to: Government policy towards labor unions. The policy of their national government and law should be: Trade unions may exist and worker membership is voluntary. or Trade unions may exist and all workers must have membership in one. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 419 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 143 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 188 |
| Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
| Random quote: "You know what's interesting about Washington? It's the kind of place where second-guessing has become second nature." - George W. Bush |