We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: FPA 7-18/2 Family Planning Responsibilities
Details
Submitted by[?]: Teleurstelling Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2419
Description[?]:
| As the state has maintained the healthy out look of limiting the ability to kill a child in the womb, so to must it make all possible efforts to aid stopping the unwanted pregnancy from occurring. A proper subsidized set of contraceptive measures is logical and responsible in operation with current abortion laws. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on subsidising contraception.
Old value:: The government does not supply free or discounted contraceptives.
Current: The government subsidises a considerable discount for contraceptives.
Proposed: The government subsidises a considerable discount for contraceptives.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:42:44, June 24, 2007 CET | From | Teleurstelling Party | To | Debating the FPA 7-18/2 Family Planning Responsibilities |
| Message | We support limiting Abortion. However that position carries with it the need to be responsible and ensure both men and women have available the means to avoid unwanted pregnancy. As well with the state subsidizing contraceptives some of the traditional stigma associated with their use may be washed away. Simply put, socially conservative individuals who are concerned about the life of an unborn child can not have their cake and eat it too. We must choose, no abortions plus readily available contraceptives or abortions and no contraceptives. A person who does want their child will find a way to get rid of it. Why not remove that from the equation? |
| Date | 14:43:44, June 24, 2007 CET | From | Teleurstelling Party | To | Debating the FPA 7-18/2 Family Planning Responsibilities |
| Message | OOC: When the phrase "no abortions" is used I am not commenting directly on policy but rather on the spirit of the current legislation which limits abortions. |
| Date | 15:11:28, June 24, 2007 CET | From | Luthori Christian Women's Association | To | Debating the FPA 7-18/2 Family Planning Responsibilities |
| Message | We very strongly support making contraception more easily available. Belinda Braithwaite (Leader of the LCWA) |
| Date | 16:29:25, June 24, 2007 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the FPA 7-18/2 Family Planning Responsibilities |
| Message | We have considered the arguments of our Hon Friends in the Falls Party and will support this bill. |
| Date | 17:17:24, June 24, 2007 CET | From | Secular Party | To | Debating the FPA 7-18/2 Family Planning Responsibilities |
| Message | We support this bill as well. |
| Date | 03:36:42, June 25, 2007 CET | From | Christian Royalist Party | To | Debating the FPA 7-18/2 Family Planning Responsibilities |
| Message | Contraception is against God's plan and leads to other gateways for sin. |
| Date | 04:24:21, June 25, 2007 CET | From | Secular Party | To | Debating the FPA 7-18/2 Family Planning Responsibilities |
| Message | If they're against this "plan of God," then why do they exist? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 53 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 24 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 6 |
| Random fact: Real life-life nationalities, cultures or ethnicities should not be referenced in Particracy (eg. "German"). |
| Random quote: "In politics, madame, you need two things: friends, but above all an enemy." - Brian Mulroney |