Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 02:16:39
Server time: 17:43:20, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): hyraemous | lulus | Moderation | SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Culture Protection Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Christian Royalist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2420

Description[?]:

There needs to be some reasonable copyright laws so that people don't steal other people's intellectual creativity, work, and property.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:26:23, June 26, 2007 CET
FromLuthori Christian Women's Association
ToDebating the Culture Protection Act
MessageI hope this Bill will encourage invention and innovativeness.


Belinda Braithwaite
(Leader of the LCWA)

Date14:52:02, June 26, 2007 CET
FromSecular Party
ToDebating the Culture Protection Act
MessageWe vehementally support this bill.

Date15:03:23, June 26, 2007 CET
FromSecular Party
ToDebating the Culture Protection Act
MessageWhy would anyone vote against this?

Date15:51:36, June 26, 2007 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Culture Protection Act
MessageBecause we believe that copyright is a bar to invention and innovativeness. You, on the other hand, assume that only the original inventor has the ability to improve on his design and force everyone else to come with something slightly different.

Date20:31:20, June 26, 2007 CET
FromSecular Party
ToDebating the Culture Protection Act
MessageCopyright a bar to invention and innovation? Hardly. On the contrary, it forces rivals or would-be rivals of the inventor to create something better.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 42

no
   

Total Seats: 17

abstain
 

Total Seats: 24


Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that.

Random quote: "Politics: a strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. The conduct of public affairs for private advantage." - Ambrose Bierce

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56