We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Rejection of Biological and Chemical Arms
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2091
Description[?]:
| We seek cross-party support in reaffirming our national position on chemical and biological arms, ie. that they are deplorable and we will not stoop to the level of those who would advocate their use. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Current: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Proposed: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:20:49, August 05, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Liberal Party | To | Debating the Rejection of Biological and Chemical Arms |
| Message | We anticipate a fairly straightforward debate on this issue and as such are putting it to vote early. |
| Date | 17:22:27, August 05, 2005 CET | From |  Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the Rejection of Biological and Chemical Arms |
| Message | I am in complete agreement. Owning these weapons will damage Hobrazia in unforseen way's and perhaps destroy it as well. |
| Date | 18:04:47, August 05, 2005 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the Rejection of Biological and Chemical Arms |
| Message | Though we would like to point out (as seems to have been an argument in many other Countries) that this law does not stop us from researching with chemical and biological products that could either a) be of advantage to us for economic use or b) prevent us from researching chemical or biological agents in order to counteract and produce possible vaccines should these deplorable weapons be used against ourselves (at least thats how I read it, so if anyone thinks any different, please inform me!) |
| Date | 00:43:12, August 06, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Liberal Party | To | Debating the Rejection of Biological and Chemical Arms |
| Message | We understand your concerns, but there can surely be a way of researching ways to treat victims whilst also undertaking not to produce these weapons. |
| Date | 13:42:16, August 06, 2005 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the Rejection of Biological and Chemical Arms |
| Message | Done. (see Technological Research Proposal) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 368 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 32 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to make a reasonable effort to be accurate when communicating the rules to other players. Any player who manipulatively misleads another player about the rules will be subject to sanction. |
| Random quote: "Because we don't think about future generations, they will never forget us." - Henrik Tikkanen |