Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5471
Next month in: 02:55:30
Server time: 13:04:29, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): Caoimhean | Liu Che | Luzzina | Twilighty00 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Segregation

Details

Submitted by[?]: HaLeumit Tikvah

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2422

Description[?]:

While the government should not approve or support segregation, it doesnt have the right to tell private organisations how to run their business.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:50:10, June 29, 2007 CET
FromLaissez Faire party
ToDebating the Segregation
MessageWe support.

Date04:08:38, July 01, 2007 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the Segregation
MessageThis is not liberty.

Date12:58:11, July 01, 2007 CET
FromHaLeumit Tikvah
ToDebating the Segregation
MessageYes it is- liberty to do as you wish with your business. If people dont like how they run things, they can just not send their children to their schools or use those facilities.

Date16:03:42, July 01, 2007 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the Segregation
MessageNo this is not, see this is idiotic you libertarians are like robots to your ideology even no matter how twisted it gets.

Date16:40:06, July 01, 2007 CET
FromHaLeumit Tikvah
ToDebating the Segregation
MessageSimply saying "no it isnt" doesnt prove your point. And we're not libertarians.

Date16:52:32, July 01, 2007 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the Segregation
MessageI'm sorry to tell you but you are.

Date16:55:22, July 01, 2007 CET
FromHaLeumit Tikvah
ToDebating the Segregation
MessageDamn, we were worried about that.
But since we're subsidising education and funding pre-school, I guess we're just not very good ones.

Date16:58:33, July 01, 2007 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the Segregation
MessageNo I've heard of some libertarians that think and use their minds when voting and vote sanely so you are kinda a stonewall libertarian.

Date17:01:50, July 01, 2007 CET
FromHaLeumit Tikvah
ToDebating the Segregation
MessageWell thats nice, but it has nothing to do with this bill, so we wont debate it here.

Date11:05:34, July 02, 2007 CET
FromConservative Progressive
ToDebating the Segregation
Messagecan these commies shut up?????
they aren't better!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 110

no
  

Total Seats: 45

abstain
   

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker).

Random quote: "The first step in freeing yourself from social restrictions is the realization that there is no such thing as a 'safe' code of conduct, one that would earn everyone's approval. Your actions can always be condemned by someone, for being too bold or too apathetic, for being too conformist or too nonconformist, for being too liberal or too conservative. So it's necessary to decide whose approval is important to you." - Harry Browne

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 71