We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Segregation
Details
Submitted by[?]: HaLeumit Tikvah
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2422
Description[?]:
While the government should not approve or support segregation, it doesnt have the right to tell private organisations how to run their business. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Racial segregation of public amenities (eg. drinking fountains, public toilets)
Old value:: Segregation of any public amenity is banned.
Current: Segregation of any public amenity is banned.
Proposed: Government owned amenities are not segregated, private organisations are free to choose.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Policy concerning racial segregation in educational institutions.
Old value:: Segregation is illegal in all educational institutions.
Current: Segregation is illegal in all educational institutions.
Proposed: Public educational institutions cannot be segregated, private institutions can choose to apply a policy of segregation.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:50:10, June 29, 2007 CET | From | Laissez Faire party | To | Debating the Segregation |
Message | We support. |
Date | 04:08:38, July 01, 2007 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Segregation |
Message | This is not liberty. |
Date | 12:58:11, July 01, 2007 CET | From | HaLeumit Tikvah | To | Debating the Segregation |
Message | Yes it is- liberty to do as you wish with your business. If people dont like how they run things, they can just not send their children to their schools or use those facilities. |
Date | 16:03:42, July 01, 2007 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Segregation |
Message | No this is not, see this is idiotic you libertarians are like robots to your ideology even no matter how twisted it gets. |
Date | 16:40:06, July 01, 2007 CET | From | HaLeumit Tikvah | To | Debating the Segregation |
Message | Simply saying "no it isnt" doesnt prove your point. And we're not libertarians. |
Date | 16:52:32, July 01, 2007 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Segregation |
Message | I'm sorry to tell you but you are. |
Date | 16:55:22, July 01, 2007 CET | From | HaLeumit Tikvah | To | Debating the Segregation |
Message | Damn, we were worried about that. But since we're subsidising education and funding pre-school, I guess we're just not very good ones. |
Date | 16:58:33, July 01, 2007 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Segregation |
Message | No I've heard of some libertarians that think and use their minds when voting and vote sanely so you are kinda a stonewall libertarian. |
Date | 17:01:50, July 01, 2007 CET | From | HaLeumit Tikvah | To | Debating the Segregation |
Message | Well thats nice, but it has nothing to do with this bill, so we wont debate it here. |
Date | 11:05:34, July 02, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Progressive | To | Debating the Segregation |
Message | can these commies shut up????? they aren't better! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 110 | |||
no | Total Seats: 45 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker). |
Random quote: "The first step in freeing yourself from social restrictions is the realization that there is no such thing as a 'safe' code of conduct, one that would earn everyone's approval. Your actions can always be condemned by someone, for being too bold or too apathetic, for being too conformist or too nonconformist, for being too liberal or too conservative. So it's necessary to decide whose approval is important to you." - Harry Browne |