We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: More "love" in liberty
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Workers Union
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2423
Description[?]:
| After Mr. and Mrs. MacHenderson where brutally assaulted by a swat team and anti-riot police force for holding hands in a park, the question if such strick laws on the display of public affection are to be enforced.We belive that only the most obscene acts are to be limited, after all we can not limit love, now can we. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: All public displays of affection are illegal.
Current: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Proposed: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 302 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 198 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 156 |
| Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer". |
| Random quote: "Ask the experimenters why they experiment on animals, and the answer is: "Because the animals are like us." Ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, and the answer is: "Because the animals are not like us." Animal experimentation rests on a logical contradiction." - Charles R. Magel |