We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Party Proposal Limits
Details
Submitted by[?]: HaLeumit Tikvah
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2424
Description[?]:
| The current party proposal limits were set at the current high level to quickly destroy the legislation of the Islamic Theocracy. Nowadays the current level just leaves the Sanhedrin swamped with bills. We propose these more sensible party proposal limits. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The number of proposals a party can introduce per year (will be handed out as a monthly quota).
Old value:: 12
Current: 12
Proposed: 8
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The maximum proposal quota a party can accumulate.
Old value:: 20
Current: 24
Proposed: 14
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:12:23, July 03, 2007 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Party Proposal Limits |
| Message | This bill is an attempt to silence the opposition parties and there is no need for such a bill. |
| Date | 18:14:07, July 03, 2007 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Party Proposal Limits |
| Message | And what do you mean swamped with bills? You sound like that were all missing votes. |
| Date | 22:17:49, July 03, 2007 CET | From | HaLeumit Tikvah | To | Debating the Party Proposal Limits |
| Message | By swamped with bills we mean there are a lot of bills. If we wanted to silence opposition we would reduce the value to one. But all we are looking for is stability. Lots of proposals can lead to rapid change, while this was fine when we were trying to get rid of the theocracy, rapid change generally leads to instability. |
| Date | 01:50:29, July 04, 2007 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Party Proposal Limits |
| Message | There is no reason at all for this bill, our country is not forzen by the current number, I think we'll be fine with the current allowed number of proposals. |
| Date | 15:03:25, July 04, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Progressive | To | Debating the Party Proposal Limits |
| Message | i must agree with the social democratic party. they got a point. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 463 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 287 |
| Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368 |
| Random quote: "I do not believe that the United States should be bound by the same rules as the smallest African nation. Life isn't like that." - Richard Perle |