We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Gender Non-Segregation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Christian Royalist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2425
Description[?]:
| Segregated units hurt the effectiveness of the Empire's military. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Women in the military.
Old value:: Women serve in segregated units.
Current: Women serve alongside men.
Proposed: Women serve alongside men.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:51:32, July 07, 2007 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Military Gender Non-Segregation Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, We would be prepared to consider mixed non-combat units - but experience tells us mixed combat units do not work. I yield the floor. |
| Date | 00:13:04, July 08, 2007 CET | From | Imperial Vodka and Pimm's Party | To | Debating the Military Gender Non-Segregation Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, This will only encourage debauchery. The CDP call themselves Christian? |
| Date | 00:28:33, July 08, 2007 CET | From | Secular Party | To | Debating the Military Gender Non-Segregation Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, What does the policy towards gender in the military have to do with Christianity? I yield the floor. |
| Date | 03:22:28, July 08, 2007 CET | From | Imperial Vodka and Pimm's Party | To | Debating the Military Gender Non-Segregation Act |
| Message | Debauchery, sir! Debauchery and copulation outside of marriage! Are the Secularists as truly dense or do they mock this House? |
| Date | 10:35:06, July 08, 2007 CET | From | Christian Royalist Party | To | Debating the Military Gender Non-Segregation Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We invoke the memory of Joan of Arc in our defense of this proposal. We firmly believe that women are also gifted by God to kill our enemies. |
| Date | 16:34:12, July 08, 2007 CET | From | Secular Party | To | Debating the Military Gender Non-Segregation Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, Believe it or not, not all men and women are whores that will commit to *ahem, ahem* debauchery as soon as they each other. With the high amount of training given to our troops and their discipline, it seems quite likely that the troops will go about their duties as normal. I yield the floor. |
| Date | 23:17:27, July 08, 2007 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Military Gender Non-Segregation Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, "It seems quite likely"? The parties opposite are prepared to expirment with HSM Armed Forces when we rely on them for the defence of the Realm? Outrageous! I yield the floor. |
| Date | 01:35:44, July 09, 2007 CET | From | Secular Party | To | Debating the Military Gender Non-Segregation Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We're in peacetime. Now is the best time to experiment with the introduction of new civil liberties. I yield the floor. |
| Date | 10:54:40, July 09, 2007 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Military Gender Non-Segregation Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Experimentation during peacetime tells us nothing. The real test is the first time these rainbow battalions go onto battle. Then when they fail it is too late for the casualties that could have been avoided. This playing with patriots' lives sickens me to the core! I yield the floor. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 64 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 36 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost. |
| Random quote: "We here thank those in Deltaria who put [Zardic spy Mona Rivet] to justice in the most humane way possible. With bullets." - Sergio Rodriguez, former Egelian journalist |