We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Public affection Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Christian People's Party (IA)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2426
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: All sexually implicit actions are illegal in public.
Current: Local governments may regulate laws on public acts of affection and obscenity.
Proposed: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:47:39, July 08, 2007 CET | From | Luthori Christian Women's Association | To | Debating the Public affection Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, I do not want my children to witness people performing oral sex upon each other in public spaces. I yield the floor. Belinda Braithwaite (Viceroy & Leader of the LCWA) |
| Date | 17:38:45, July 08, 2007 CET | From | Teleurstelling Party | To | Debating the Public affection Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker Oral Sex is sexual intercourse under auspices of legality. Sexually implicit actions can be as benign as someone pinching their spouses bum or a long kiss. I yield the floor before the Puritans burn me alive. |
| Date | 20:13:01, July 08, 2007 CET | From | Secular Party | To | Debating the Public affection Act |
| Message | .::Rises::. So, first my party are called a bunch and heathens, and now we're called puritans. So, which is it? *soft laughter is heard from the Secular Party members* I yield the floor. |
| Date | 23:31:40, July 08, 2007 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Public affection Act |
| Message | * Pastor John Bunyan rises. Mr Speaker, I don't want to put words into the hon member for the Teleurstelling Party's mouth, but I imagine he was talking about us. * Careers laughs erupt from the Defenders' benches. I yield the floor. |
| Date | 01:38:55, July 09, 2007 CET | From | Secular Party | To | Debating the Public affection Act |
| Message | .::Rises in Response::. I don't know why. That was your first comment. I think you give yourself too much credit. Anyway, my assumption was that were talking about everyone voting against this bill. I yield the floor, but unlike the BCD, not my insanity. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 26 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 74 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: http://www.fantasynamegenerators.com and http://www.behindthename.com/random are great resources for coming up with character names from unfamiliar cultures. |
| Random quote: "The packaging for a microwavable 'microwave' dinner is programmed for a shelf life of maybe six months, a cook time of two minutes and a landfill dead-time of centuries." - David Wann |