Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5471
Next month in: 01:58:26
Server time: 18:01:33, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): fatigul | hexaus18 | Mbites2 | polishboy | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Software Source Code Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Kazulia Green Pacifist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2428

Description[?]:

This bill is to establish the governments stance on the source code of software. The government should allow both open and closed source software so those who wish for their software to be owned more or less communally have that power.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:39:10, July 12, 2007 CET
FromCSA Communist Party of the DPRK
ToDebating the Software Source Code Bill
Messagewe see these as a step in the right direction

Date02:18:39, July 13, 2007 CET
FromThe Democratic Socialists of Kazulia
ToDebating the Software Source Code Bill
MessageAs do I.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 750

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Particracy isn't just a game, it also has a forum, where players meet up to discuss role-playing, talk about in-game stuff, run their own newspaper or organisation and even discuss non-game and real-life issues! Check it out: http://forum.particracy.net/

    Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 48