We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Less Left More Central Cabinet Proposal of March 2092
Details
Submitted by[?]: Adam Smith Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2093
Description[?]:
It is impossible to offer CUP a seat as they have no MPs at the moment. |
Proposals
Article 1
As per the Constitution, the President of the Commonwealth chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Adam Smith Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Tuesday Is Coming
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Democractic Socialist Party of Lodamun
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Tuesday Is Coming
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Lodamun Centre-Left Coalition
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Lodamun Centre-Left Coalition
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Democractic Socialist Party of Lodamun
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Adam Smith Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Tuesday Is Coming
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:45:37, August 08, 2005 CET | From | Adam Smith Party | To | Debating the Less Left More Central Cabinet Proposal of March 2092 |
Message | If any nominated party wishes to request a different position, please ask either here, or by message to ASP |
Date | 04:58:21, August 08, 2005 CET | From | CNT/AFL | To | Debating the Less Left More Central Cabinet Proposal of March 2092 |
Message | We urge the DSP and PCL to reject this cabinet in favour of a pan-left cabinet. |
Date | 06:56:59, August 08, 2005 CET | From | Lodamun Centre-Left Coalition | To | Debating the Less Left More Central Cabinet Proposal of March 2092 |
Message | We note to the CNT/AFL that we will not vote in favour of a Cabinet that does not include the PCL, but will consider rejecting this Cabinet if a more suitable one is proposed. |
Date | 16:32:41, August 08, 2005 CET | From | Adam Smith Party | To | Debating the Less Left More Central Cabinet Proposal of March 2092 |
Message | Let us try it then. |
Date | 23:20:00, August 08, 2005 CET | From | Democractic Socialist Party of Lodamun | To | Debating the Less Left More Central Cabinet Proposal of March 2092 |
Message | I will reject this for the same reason i rejected the other cabinet proposal. Although this one is less blatantly partisan. I'd still like the position of Secretary of Defense, but I dont see that happening as the DSP is pacifistic. |
Date | 01:46:15, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Adam Smith Party | To | Debating the Less Left More Central Cabinet Proposal of March 2092 |
Message | There is absolutely nothing wrong with the ministry of Defense being held by a pacifist, so long as it is an intelligent pacifist who realises that not all countries around us are peaceful in intentions. A good pacifist MoD would keep a strong and efficient military force, but would look to avoid conflict. A position we would agree with. |
Date | 05:34:02, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Less Left More Central Cabinet Proposal of March 2092 |
Message | Pacifism when your own person is the only one in danger is one thing, you are only risking yourself, which you own the rights to. Pacifism when other's are at stake is a different matter. The ministry of defence is supposed to defend Lodamun from foreign aggression. Failure to accomplish this due to personal beliefs is unacceptable. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 149 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 301 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Once approved, players should copy Cultural Protocols into a bill in the debate section of their nation page, under the title of "OOC: Cultural Protocols". This bill should include links to the passed Cultural Protocol bill and the Moderation approval. |
Random quote: "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting that vote." - Unknown |