Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5472
Next month in: 01:58:02
Server time: 02:01:57, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Less Left More Central Cabinet Proposal of March 2092

Details

Submitted by[?]: Adam Smith Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2093

Description[?]:

It is impossible to offer CUP a seat as they have no MPs at the moment.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:45:37, August 08, 2005 CET
FromAdam Smith Party
ToDebating the Less Left More Central Cabinet Proposal of March 2092
MessageIf any nominated party wishes to request a different position, please ask either here, or by message to ASP

Date04:58:21, August 08, 2005 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the Less Left More Central Cabinet Proposal of March 2092
MessageWe urge the DSP and PCL to reject this cabinet in favour of a pan-left cabinet.

Date06:56:59, August 08, 2005 CET
FromLodamun Centre-Left Coalition
ToDebating the Less Left More Central Cabinet Proposal of March 2092
MessageWe note to the CNT/AFL that we will not vote in favour of a Cabinet that does not include the PCL, but will consider rejecting this Cabinet if a more suitable one is proposed.

Date16:32:41, August 08, 2005 CET
FromAdam Smith Party
ToDebating the Less Left More Central Cabinet Proposal of March 2092
MessageLet us try it then.

Date23:20:00, August 08, 2005 CET
FromDemocractic Socialist Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the Less Left More Central Cabinet Proposal of March 2092
MessageI will reject this for the same reason i rejected the other cabinet proposal.

Although this one is less blatantly partisan.

I'd still like the position of Secretary of Defense, but I dont see that happening as the DSP is pacifistic.

Date01:46:15, August 09, 2005 CET
FromAdam Smith Party
ToDebating the Less Left More Central Cabinet Proposal of March 2092
MessageThere is absolutely nothing wrong with the ministry of Defense being held by a pacifist, so long as it is an intelligent pacifist who realises that not all countries around us are peaceful in intentions. A good pacifist MoD would keep a strong and efficient military force, but would look to avoid conflict. A position we would agree with.

Date05:34:02, August 09, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Less Left More Central Cabinet Proposal of March 2092
MessagePacifism when your own person is the only one in danger is one thing, you are only risking yourself, which you own the rights to.
Pacifism when other's are at stake is a different matter. The ministry of defence is supposed to defend Lodamun from foreign aggression. Failure to accomplish this due to personal beliefs is unacceptable.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 149

no
     

Total Seats: 301

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Once approved, players should copy Cultural Protocols into a bill in the debate section of their nation page, under the title of "OOC: Cultural Protocols". This bill should include links to the passed Cultural Protocol bill and the Moderation approval.

    Random quote: "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting that vote." - Unknown

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 63