We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Priority Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Militarist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2429
Description[?]:
| This Bill is meant to put more priority into building and maintaining the military. This is due to the fact that our nation's stance on the military is minimal, insignificant, and tiny. -Previous Priority: Tiny -Proposed Priority: Mderate or Strong |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:17:05, July 15, 2007 CET | From | Radical Labor Confederation | To | Debating the Military Priority Bill |
| Message | What is this actually suggesting? |
| Date | 09:32:09, July 16, 2007 CET | From | Supporters of Science in Design (IP) | To | Debating the Military Priority Bill |
| Message | We support Moderate, so as to defend ourselves. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 45 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 101 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 54 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: “Tell these old, grey men that their time is over. Tell them to give us back our future, and then get lost!” - Benji Benandez, former Dranian politician |