We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: smoking
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Imperial Party (Nazi Party)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2093
Description[?]:
it shouldn't be difficult to get to sigarets |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards smoking.
Old value:: Smoking is legal outdoors and in private homes and clubs, but illegal indoors in all places of employment.
Current: Smoking is legal outdoors and in private homes and clubs, but illegal indoors in all places of employment.
Proposed: Smoking is legal outdoors and in private homes and clubs, but illegal indoors in places of employment, with the exception of places that primarily serve liquor.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 15:56:10, August 08, 2005 CET | From | Society of Sadists | To | Debating the smoking |
Message | It should at least be LEGAL. |
Date | 15:56:59, August 08, 2005 CET | From | NATIONAL UNION | To | Debating the smoking |
Message | Indeed. |
Date | 17:12:31, August 08, 2005 CET | From | Jesters & Jugglers Party | To | Debating the smoking |
Message | smoking kills people i strongly oppose legalizing it |
Date | 17:15:10, August 08, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Imperial Party (Nazi Party) | To | Debating the smoking |
Message | cars kill people, we allow them to |
Date | 17:24:43, August 08, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Imperial Party (Nazi Party) | To | Debating the smoking |
Message | cars kill people, we allow them to |
Date | 20:10:22, August 08, 2005 CET | From | Jesters & Jugglers Party | To | Debating the smoking |
Message | cars are different then sigarets it's easyer to live without sigarets then without a car a car is more "needed" (for transportation) then sigarets sigarets have no meaning cars have (cars make the life of people easyer) |
Date | 11:26:04, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Imperial Party (Nazi Party) | To | Debating the smoking |
Message | red meat could harm the health, we eat it, beer isn't good, we allow alcohol. Medicins are bad for the body, even when they help for a desease, still, we take them. For some people (all the smokers), a cigarette is necessary. |
Date | 13:01:16, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Jesters & Jugglers Party | To | Debating the smoking |
Message | red meat only harms the one who eats it beer only harms the one who drinks it (unless they drive with a car but that's not allowed) medicins are only bad for the people who take them (not even all medicines are bad) BUT cigarettes also damage people who don't need a cigarette but inhale the smoke of others who do we can't let the passive smokers pay the price for someones addiction |
Date | 14:57:21, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Imperial Party (Nazi Party) | To | Debating the smoking |
Message | so does a bus in the street. our cars dont drive on air, you know. the provide cancer. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 59 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 33 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 8 |
Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to prevent confusion by ensuring unofficial or outdated bills labelled as "Cultural Protocols" are removed from their nation page. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |