We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Public Decency Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Drtárék Jelbék Prta
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2438
Description[?]:
What need is there for persons to go about their daily business naked. This perversion is not necessary, if people want to be naked then it should be in private. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on public nudity.
Old value:: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Current: Public nudity laws are left to local governments.
Proposed: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:01:32, July 30, 2007 CET | From | Bloc Militaire pour Restauration | To | Debating the Public Decency Bill |
Message | we oppose |
Date | 13:25:05, July 30, 2007 CET | From | Parti Communiste de Jelbania | To | Debating the Public Decency Bill |
Message | We support the current policy |
Date | 14:13:54, July 30, 2007 CET | From | Centre Démocratique | To | Debating the Public Decency Bill |
Message | We will support the JKK in this effort to promote decency. |
Date | 20:04:06, July 30, 2007 CET | From | Drtárék Jelbék Prta | To | Debating the Public Decency Bill |
Message | How can the LPJ and JCP oppose? What is the point of public nudity? Why are the LPJ so keen on turning the human body into nothing more than an object? With their advocacy of violent porn and public nudity they strive to reduce the full capacity of human emotions and turn Jelbanians into machines that cannot differentiate between love and animalism. |
Date | 10:29:55, July 31, 2007 CET | From | Bloc Militaire pour Restauration | To | Debating the Public Decency Bill |
Message | If someone wants to turn their body into a machine that's fine, because they hinder no one else with public nudity; you can easily look away; why should their freedom be taken away even though it hinders no one? |
Date | 12:35:23, July 31, 2007 CET | From | Drtárék Jelbék Prta | To | Debating the Public Decency Bill |
Message | You can easily look away? So the freedom of others is curtailed? Why should a freedom be granted that benefits noone? And of course public nudity is a hindrence because it provides an unnecessary distraction. |
Date | 00:49:40, August 02, 2007 CET | From | orgonic party | To | Debating the Public Decency Bill |
Message | A naked body is not indecent in itself, nudity and pornography are not the same. On the contrary, If you want more perverted adult people, let more children to grow up with shame of nudity, We oppose. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 150 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 351 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: "Doxxing", or the publishing of personally identifiable information about another player without permission, is forbidden. |
Random quote: "The two greatest obstacles to democracy in the United States are, first, the widespread delusion among the poor that we have a democracy, and second, the chronic terror among the rich, lest we get it." - Edward Dowling |