Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5461
Next month in: 00:18:45
Server time: 07:41:14, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Brazil25 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: RSP Union Reform Act 2436

Details

Submitted by[?]: Revolutionary Socialist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2437

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:24:05, July 30, 2007 CET
From "Le Chaim" - Aesthetic Party
ToDebating the RSP Union Reform Act 2436
MessageAnd again we fully support parts of the bill (Articles one and two), the third is going too far, nevertheless we will vote yes...

Date01:44:08, August 01, 2007 CET
From Alliance for Freedom and Liberty
ToDebating the RSP Union Reform Act 2436
MessageOnce again, the RSP tries to undermine the rights of the individual with Article 1of this bill. It seeks to take the control of businesses out of the hands of those who built and funded them and thus take all the risk that comes with being an enterpreteneur.

That being said, we could support the expansion of workers' rights in Article 2 and 3. But we also expect that the RSP will try to undermine the rights of the employers' side which are protected under current legislation. All in all, the Alliance for Freedom and Liberty declines another of the RSP's attempts to turn this country into a socialist dictatorship and tyranny.

Press Release - Jobdan van Fuxfell, AFL Speaker on Trade and Industry

Date02:15:28, August 01, 2007 CET
From Revolutionary Socialist Party
ToDebating the RSP Union Reform Act 2436
MessageDemocratic workers councils .. its giving the PEOPLE control of the means of production and not a private operator .

The RSP knew full well the seizure of private property was going a little too far and would be rejected so has removed that article from it .

Clearly the AFL has no sense of what socialism is and seeks to halt a progress on workers rights in Hutori by using a slogan of anti-left rhetoric .

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 101

no
    

Total Seats: 104

abstain
  

Total Seats: 45


Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map.

Random quote: "The first step in freeing yourself from social restrictions is the realization that there is no such thing as a 'safe' code of conduct, one that would earn everyone's approval. Your actions can always be condemned by someone, for being too bold or too apathetic, for being too conformist or too nonconformist, for being too liberal or too conservative. So it's necessary to decide whose approval is important to you." - Harry Browne

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59