We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Luxury Tax
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2438
Description[?]:
Tax bill |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Sales tax on luxury goods.
Old value:: 1
Current: 25
Proposed: 20
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 15:57:55, July 31, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Monarchistic Party | To | Debating the Luxury Tax |
Message | At most 5% |
Date | 16:06:46, July 31, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Party | To | Debating the Luxury Tax |
Message | We need to balance the cut of corporation tax from 49% to whatever I changed it too. We're currently running a deficit until a budget cut or a tax hike. I propose raising luxury tax and cutting the overall budget, but increasing education and health. |
Date | 18:10:06, July 31, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Monarchistic Party | To | Debating the Luxury Tax |
Message | We can just cut the deficit amount from office of Head of State and that should solve the problem. We could also shift 30 billons from foregin affairs to education, as we find it crucial for our society. However, we do not agree to raise amounts of money spent on social services as our image of state is different. |
Date | 18:20:47, July 31, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Party | To | Debating the Luxury Tax |
Message | I don't know about Head of Government. All of the other parties here seem to have a fetish about pumping it full of money. All the Prime Minister needs is an office, secretary, transport and a few perks. He doesn't fund anything important himself. That's why we have Ministries. I suppose we could transfer from foreign to education. But we do find health important too. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 236 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 269 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with. |
Random quote: “Under democracy one party always devotes its chief energies to trying to prove that the other party is unfit to rule - and both commonly succeed, and are right.” --H.L. Mencken |