We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Defence Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Monarchistic Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2438
Description[?]:
| A proposal to cancel our participation in "Ban on Land Mines" |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the Ban on Land Mines.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:20:14, July 31, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Monarchistic Party | To | Debating the National Defence Act |
| Message | Land mines are basic tools of defence. Our national security is endangered. Total ban is not a solution. We should propose a treaty in which countries would agree to instatly dismantle land mines after the end of a conflict. |
| Date | 19:19:16, July 31, 2007 CET | From | Social Justice Party | To | Debating the National Defence Act |
| Message | We oppose, as this is a bill against peace, and a bill that shows the monarchists attempt to kill civilians. |
| Date | 19:41:12, July 31, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Monarchistic Party | To | Debating the National Defence Act |
| Message | As far as I know land mines purpose isn't killing civilians. They aren't even for killing soldiers, but to deter anyone from crossing certain areas, which are marked usually by "MINES!" sing with a Jolly Roger. As for danger for civilians, you should familiarize yourselves with my statement again ( "treaty in which countries would agree to instatly dismantle land mines after the end of a conflict.") |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 258 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 247 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "I'll see you in the Palace in Kivonia once we win this war... and I'm ecstatic to be the one to execute you. Sleep well." - Queen Annalise, former Telamonese monarch |